User talk:Tutu0819
Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).
We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:
- Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
- The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.
– Þjarkur (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Reliable medical sources
[edit]Hey there. The National Institute of Health does not publish these papers, it only hosts the PubMed search engine, which contains all kinds of papers. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, it's very easy or even automatic to add full citations if you're citing a journal or a webpage, you just need the DOI or the URL.
I'd also recommend looking over WP:MEDRS, we try not to cite primary research.
If you ever have any questions you can ask on my talk page :) – Þjarkur (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Tutu0819, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Tutu0819! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 4 April 2019 (UTC) |
Reviews
[edit]Hey there. We try not to refer to primary sources, per WP:MEDRS: Primary sources should generally not be used for medical content – as such sources often include unreliable or preliminary information. The best sources are review articles which sum um what others have said. Writing about small studies can be very misleading, for example, even though there do exist small studies "proving" the effectiveness of acupuncture, review articles find no efficacy.
It's also good to summarize studies in the form of "X was found to be effective at minimizing Y" instead of details about how the studies were set up, here it also helps to cite secondary sources since they are summarizing.
You also can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, it's easy to automatically add a full citation to a journal if you have the DOI.
Thanks :)
– Þjarkur (talk) 11:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]|
|
Hi Tutu0819! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|