User talk:TwinBoo

Welcome!

Hello, TwinBoo!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilkinstown (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review WP:GEOLAND and explain what makes this place notable, and what evidence supports that. Otherwise, provide sufficient secondary sources with significant coverage of the place, to establish notability per WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wilkinstown and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TwinBoo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GNRI Class SG3 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, GNRI Class SG3, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilkinstown has been accepted

Wilkinstown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:GNRI Class SG3

Hello, TwinBoo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GNRI Class SG3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Irish county redirects

In order to test what you had said at Talk:Meath (disambiguation)#Requested move 31 July 2024 about "most other Irish counties without eponymous county towns redirect to the county" I created User:Crouch, Swale/Irish counties and at the time the RM was open only Laois, Offaly and Westmeath redirected to the counties, Dún Laoghaire–Rathdown, Fingal and South Dublin do not include the "County" prefix. In fact 5 without eponymous county towns are DAB pages namely Clare, Down, Kerry, Louth and Tyrone and Fermanagh goes to the kingdom. However as you noted "most other articles linked on this page are just less important articles related to the county" which I think is on point, Laois, Offaly and Westmeath redirect to the county since similar to Meath most of the other uses are for the county on the other hand Clare, Down, Kerry, Louth and Tyrone have other distinct uses such as unrelated places and other non-geographical uses so as such the counties aren't primary but Fermanagh is interesting, it used to be a redirect to the county until 2017 when the kingdom article was created, perhaps that should be moved to Kingdom of Fermanagh and redirected to the county? Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]