User talk:UI1990

Welcome!

Hello, UI1990, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 02:29, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UI1990, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi UI1990! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of University of Pune people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign secretary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of alumni

Please do not create unsourced lists of alumni. You even disregard your own instruction at the head not to add uncited people. Fiddle Faddle 11:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I haven't done anything wrong. Please don't revert the names and destroy the lists that I have started. Look at similar list elsewhere. Look at List of University of Washington people or List of Georgia State University people or List of University of Delaware people. All the names that were included in List of University of Pune people or List of Osmania University people were students or faculty members at those universities. Instead of removing names, it might be worthwhile to add citations to the lists. UI1990 (talk) 02:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Look at List of University of Georgia people or List of University of Chicago alumni or List of Wichita State University people or List of Kansas State University people and many many similar lists. Those lists are similar to the lists that I've started, OK? I just hope that everything is cool. :) UI1990 (talk) 02:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timtrent, I noticed that you removed the names from List of Osmania University people again, without discussing with me. Your claim that "All non cited names will be removed per WP:BLP" doesn't apply to "List of [Name of the university] people" lists, OK? People can click on the biographies and see whether they were students or faculty members at the university or not. By your claim, many names on many many lists like List of University of Cambridge members, List of Durham University people, List of University of Nottingham people, etc. will have to be removed. UI1990 (talk) 05:48, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From what I know, if each and every names in the list are cited, the list goes on to become a Featured List. You can't set the highest standard for List of Osmania University people and sub-par standard for other similar lists. I do believe that the lists that I started, namely List of University of Pune people and List of Osmania University people, are good enough. More citations can be added and the lists can be enhanced. UI1990 (talk) 09:43, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not a useful argument. Hold those lists to the highest standard yourself. Fiddle Faddle 14:59, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. UI1990 (talk) 03:46, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By insisting upon high standards we create a far better encyclopaedia. Our duty is to do better every time we edit. Fiddle Faddle 10:36, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Lightwood

I don't think it is clear that Ray Lightwood's BSc in Pure Science was an honorary degree. Although Lightwood was 52, he appears to have had no previous undergraduate degree and was strictly speaking employed in the role of a technician rather than an academic. I know of no other case of Birmingham University awarding an undergraduate Bachelors degree as an honorary degree, certainly not as late as 1974. I had supposed that Lightwood had studied for the degree in his own time or as part of his technician job, which would not be so unusual for an employee in a technical capacity. It is nowhere stated (in the sources that I have been able to find) that the BSc was an honorary degree, and so until there is some evidence that it was an honorary degree I think Lightwood should be in the alumni page. Neither of the two sources that I have found online state that it was an honorary degree. Mirrortoamermaid (talk) 14:32, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have now found the evidence that the BSc was not honorary

I have now found the evidence that Ray Lightwood's BSc was not honorary: "In 1974, he obtained the Official Degree of BSc for which he submitted a thesis under the title 'An inductively coupled system for electrical pacemaking of the heart' (a copy of which is available in the University's Main Library, Thesis Store Diss.S4.B74)"[1] Mirrortoamermaid (talk) 16:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References on Birmingham University alumni page

Sorry, I was attempting to clean up the Birmingham University Alumni page by removing the references. The references appeared redundant or tautological, as there are links to all the subjects' Wikipedia articles which include all the references. Some of the references were added on the alumni page for subjects who did not have their own wikipedia articles, and so no longer appear necessary once an article had been created for them. Only some of the subjects had references on the Birmingham University Alumnus page, so there appears an inconsistency for some subjects to have references but not others.Mirrortoamermaid (talk) 10:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your thoughtful reply. I've done a fair amount of work on "List of [Name of the university] people" lists. The lists have to be treat as an independent entity and if each and every names in the list are cited, the list goes on to become a Featured List. There are some inconsistencies on List of University of Birmingham alumni page. However, it will be better if every names in that page are cited. Here are some Featured List: List of Georgia Institute of Technology alumni, List of University of Central Florida alumni, and List of University of Waterloo people. They are all impressive lists, and each and every names on those pages are cited. UI1990 (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Parker (dancer)

You seem to have managed to nominate the dab page at Robert Parker for deletion instead of or as well as the dancer. I've done what I can to clear it up but you might like to have another look. PamD 12:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Bennett

Sorry about that, there was a spammer promoting "Jonathan Bennetts" here and there last year, mostly by creating new articles; I speedied this one when tidying up and realised my mistake moments later, but must have forgotten to revert the warning that ended up on your page. Warning removed as requested. For future reference, Wikipedia editors are always welcome to go ahead and remove any message from their own user talk pages at any time. --McGeddon (talk) 12:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vistasp Karbhari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vistasp Karbhari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vistasp Karbhari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light21 17:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light2021 (talk • contribs)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, UI1990. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]