User talk:Umhafs072

October 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abubakar Malami have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abubakar Malami was changed by Umhafs072 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902984 on 2021-10-29T22:08:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Life bencher

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Life bencher, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dauda Danladi mungadi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dauda Danladi mungadi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 08:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 12:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Malami

Explain your edits. Watercheetah99 (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't ever delete my article Umhafs072 (talk) 16:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explain your edits. Watercheetah99 (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will not explain Umhafs072 (talk) 20:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if you delete it hundred times I will published it Umhafs072 (talk) 20:47, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't how this website works, edits must be clear, minor, and/or explained, if not they will be removed. Watercheetah99 (talk) 21:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

so which explaination did you want I have already upload the citation Umhafs072 (talk) 21:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read what I've been saying for the past month? I added that text to a different section the "Malami wrote letter" text to its correct section, it's redundant. Watercheetah99 (talk) 21:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

so that's the only problem I will remove it Umhafs072 (talk) 21:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the only problem but if it was that easy why didn't you let me do that a month ago. I could’ve saved us a lot of time. The other issue is the violation of WP:POV with the other sections and the clear plagiarism of much of the "Achievements" section. I'm rewriting the page now; once I upload it, please bring your grievances here instead of refusing to explain yourself for another month. Thank you -- Watercheetah99 (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Finished. Watercheetah99 (talk) 21:51, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're kidding me. Your edits are redundant, stop. Watercheetah99 (talk) 02:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

your to yours are redundant stop Umhafs072 (talk) 08:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is your issue? What do you even want other than for your edit to be the one published. As i've said before, it is partially-plagiarized and violates WP:POV. If you continue without dialogue, you'll eventually get blocked. Watercheetah99 (talk) 09:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of report to Administrators

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Watercheetah99 (talk) 09:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote an article but this watercheeta99 deleted it so I need Justice from you administrators because my account have been blocked

Umhafs072 (talk) 08:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 10:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]