User talk:UniversalNation
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction and check the Teahouse to contact Wikipedians who are available for assistance, or even for a chat.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Be careful of WP:PARAPHRASE, your entry has been redacted/edited, as close paraphrasing is copyright infringement. In Wikipedia, "close paraphrasing" is considered a copy violation, akin to plagiarism. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC).
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| This barnstar is awarded to recognize particularly fine contributions to Wikipedia Kirananils (talk) 04:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for November 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Araunah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jebus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stahlhelm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cotter pin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. It would be great if you could provide reliable sources for your recent additions to the Yamaha DX1 article. This article, like many articles about musical equipment, already suffers from extensive original research and lack of citations. Please avoid contributing to that problem if you can. Per WP:PROVEIT, any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed. Thanks. Popcornfud (talk) 14:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi @Popcornfud:, Matrixsynth and Encyclotronic (both referenced by me) are, IMHO, typically reliable; and Encyclotronic along with Polynominal is my typical first-stop go-to source for HW info/specs, manuals etc. Is there a common opinion that the former two, like Vintage Synth, are not considered to be a reliable source? Btw - i acquired the DX1 Owners Manual which enables me to cross-reference. I can update accordingly. UniversalNation (talk) 15:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if Matrixsynth and Encyclotronic would pass as reliable sources on Wikipedia. They may contain accurate information, but Wikipedia also looks for evidence of editorial oversight and factchecking and that sort of thing. If this article were one day submitted for FAC, for example, I think reviewers would ask "What makes these high-quality reliable sources?"
- It might be worth asking for opinions at WP:ALBUM; if there is a consensus either way we can update the list at WP:RSINSTRUMENT for future reference. It's often difficult to find reliable online sources we can use for articles about music gear, so the more sources we can get approval for, the better!
- Aside from those, you also added lots of information without citations at all. Popcornfud (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Ok understood, i've updated the article; please review if you wish to do so. (Yes, display section _is_ detailed, as this is a definitive feature of that particular gear, but which may be too detailed for some people...)
- PS: These days, it is less and less fun for me to edit WP articles. Reason: even when writing product, systems or tool documentation in various formats at my corporate job, there are not so many guidelines, rules and exceptions to follow respective to first find out about and also memorize. No offense, just mentioning. UniversalNation (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I write in tech and I certainly have fewer rules to follow there than I do on Wikipedia. But I think following Wikipedia policy overwhelmingly produces better articles. I see it like a puzzle - we have a pile of sources and we have to figure out how to best assemble them into a coherent article. Popcornfud (talk) 22:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ARP 2500, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Banks. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
[edit]
Your edit to ARP 2500 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tonus Inc - Logo.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Tonus Inc - Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |