User talk:Urjitslad

CS1 error on Type 052D destroyer

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Type 052D destroyer, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Type 052C destroyer

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Type 052C destroyer, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Type 052C destroyer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also applies to edits to Type 052D destroyer and Type 055 destroyer

seaforces.org is not a reliable source. The author is not identified. The "About" page claims that it is merely repeating what has been reported elsewhere but fails to provide references for the data (which would likely render the site utterly redundant.) It is, in all likelihood, just another self-published enthusiast site, which are generally not considered reliable. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 06:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]