User talk:Urshakta

Urshakta, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Urshakta! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

hi, thanks for organizing Brock-brac (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pat Galloway has been accepted

Pat Galloway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 00:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edie Mckee Harper (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More WP:3PARTY needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edie Mckee Harper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 12:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edie Mckee Harper (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Acalycine was:

The article needs to be cleaned up in regards to encyclopedic tone. The *Career* section has general notes about his previous work and what he was "famous" for. Please include more independent sources that show his notability as well, if you can. A few style edits are needed as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edie Mckee Harper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Acalycine (talk) 23:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Edie Mckee Harper has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Edie Mckee Harper. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edie Mckee Harper (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boomer Vial was:

Declined per Worldbruce, content should be merged with the older linked draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edie Mckee Harper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 11:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edie McKee Harper has been accepted

Edie McKee Harper, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Devopam (talk) 07:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Elsie Shutt

Hi, I'm Robertgombos. Urshakta, thanks for creating Elsie Shutt!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Can you please reference the lead (the first paragraph of the article). After that, feel free to remove the tag.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Robert G. (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Edie Mckee Harper concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Edie Mckee Harper, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]