Jump to content

User talk:User23242343

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, User23242343, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 15:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User23242343, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 15:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to United States Forces Japan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also do you not realise the existence of the AV or AntiVandal tool. the edit has the AV tag on it. AV reverts the edit and marks it as minor but warns the user on the talk page. the primary reason i reverted your edit was the typo in the word flag.Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 14:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Horwennefer—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

God's Wives of Amun and 21st Dynasty High Priests - Pharaoh infobox

[edit]

Hello, I would like to note that despite them not being pharaohs, the 21st Dynasty High Priests of Amun and God's Wives of Amun (ex: Herihor and Amenirdis I) also use the Pharaoh infobox for the titulary parameters. The new "secessionist" parameter doesn't really seem necessary when one can simply add "Secessionist Pharaoh" or "Rebel Pharaoh" in the role parameter of the infobox, just as the aforementioned groups of articles do for their respective titles. Star11308 (talk) 20:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Star11308: I agree that an additional parameter beneath the role parameter is excessive and superfluous. Hence I have ‘modularized’ the pharaoh parameter; see e.g. Ankhwennefer (pharaoh). I hope this change is acceptable to you. User23242343 (talk) 11:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be possible to remove the "pharaoh" label when not in use with the rebel parameter? As mentioned before, articles on people who used the royal titulary but wouldn't really be considered pharaohs use the infobox such as the High Priests of Amun, Divine Adoratrices and God's Wives of Amun. Star11308 (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Star11308: Ah, I thought they were still somewhat referred to as pharaoh. Unfortunately, no, that would not really be possible and I wouldn't support it either. If these people weren’t pharaohs (in whatever capacity) then they shouldn’t use the pharaoh infobox. However, note that Template:Ancient Egyptian royal titulary case exists and it can be used within virtually any infobox (see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cleopatra&oldid=1147504324). User23242343 (talk) 08:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thank you. I wasn't aware of that template existing as a standalone template and I'll be sure to add it in when I get the chance. Star11308 (talk) 09:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I'm actually doing it (over on Amenirdis I), I realize I have no idea what I am doing as I seldom really use the source editor besides adding links to articles in footers and such. I could use a hand, if you're available. Star11308 (talk) 23:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Star11308: Of course but unfortunately I'm a little bit busy right now; I will gladly take a look at it when I have the time. User23242343 (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Star11308: is that what you had in mind? User23242343 (talk) 09:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks you! I'm not really familiar with the source editor, and I was quite overwhelmed and confused trying to figure it all out myself. I'll put that into the other God's Wife and Adoratrice articles, though I'm a still bit weary when it comes to the High Priests of Amun due to how they depicted themselves as pharaohs and held sovereignty over Upper Egypt during the 21st Dynasty. Star11308 (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Star11308: Unfortunately my knowledge of ancient Egypt is limited to the Ptolemaic Kingdom, so I can’t really help you out here. If the High Priests ruled in rebellion to the pharaohs, then perhaps the pharaoh infobox with the ‘rebel’ parameter can be used here. User23242343 (talk) 10:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained change of content

[edit]

Information icon Unexplained and incomprehensible summaries are noted. and you use editing like a sandbox, but now it's censored today. If the source is not clearly presented, rollback may eventually be the answer. The contribution you made at Habsburg monarchy three edits has been cancelled. Please excuse me. I'm afraid I can't help it, depending on the editorial guidelines, Wikipedia policies and guidelines. It's not like it's just a Wikipedia, but... In fact, such content and sources are determined by the Wikipedia itself, so verification is also carried out, so you have to choose carefully. Please refer to these below and be careful in the future.

  1. Wikipedia:AntiVandal (AV)
  2. Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1

I want you to be aware that the editing done by the parties is wrong and that it violates the two policies. --Vichycombo (talk) 13:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vichycombo: I believe it is pretty evident that I'm not a vandal and that my changes do not constitute vandalism. Your reverts seem very abrupt and not really rooted in either logic or policy. Unfortunately I cannot ascertain what aspects of my changes exactly you oppose as your message is largely unintelligible. My claims are generally backed by RS included in the article body, if you believe this to be insufficient, you are welcome to add additional sources. User23242343 (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Habsburg monarchy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 19:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GenoV84: please elucidate your revert and enlighten me. I'm very excited to hear the reasoning of yet another editor that has no clue and loves to engange utterly unwarranted newbie biting and edit warring. User23242343 (talk) 07:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you stop persisting just because a newbie reverted you and drop the stick. User23242343 (talk) 07:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that you have been warned and reverted for a persistent pattern of disruptive editing by other established editors various times before me.
Why don't you explain the reason for disrupting several articles on Wikipedia, instead of accusing other users of biting you when they have simply asked you to stop doing that? GenoV84 (talk) 08:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@GenoV84: What established editors? You mean the editor above with barely 300 edits that can't phrase a single articulate sentence and hasn't even put in the effort to explain their revert?
As I have explained in multiple edit summaries: the Habsburg monarchy is not in any way conterminous with the Holy Roman Empire and hence their is not a single reason why it should use its insignias or other data. User23242343 (talk) 08:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm referring to the WP admins and other established editors who have left several warning messages on your talk page and have reverted your edits for the exact same reasons as I did, which is disruptive editing. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our WP policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. GenoV84 (talk) 12:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your not engaging, your not discussing content. I've received a single sysop warning, which was baseless and has been reverted without opposition; all other warnings have no standing. It is insanely ironic that your bring up warnings, when you yourself have received a final warning and were nearly blocked for WP:PA. It is evident that you have no clue what the article is about and that you're instead Wikilawyering. I suggest you revert yourself or we will ask WP:ANI what they think of your exemplary conduct. User23242343 (talk) 12:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is your talk page, not mine. You have 4 warnings on your talk page and have been reverted by multiple editors, including one admin, and they were evidently right to do so. I suggest you to learn how to follow the WP rules and guidelines and contribute constructively to this encyclopedia instead of harassing other users who have been trying to help you. GenoV84 (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Shadow pinging Materialscientist and hoping that he sides with you, is an attempt at WP:canvassing. Materialscientist was right in a way where my edit summary explaining my contributions to the page could have been more elaborate; I've explained my changes in more detail in a subsequent edit, my changes have been discussed on the talk with a different editor, and a compromise has been found. Otherwise, my first warning was issued by a guy who believed minor edits containing edit summaries to be vandalism. The third warning was--as mentioned--made by a person that couldn't word a single articulate sentence and the 4th warning is from you.
So now let's talk content. Are there any specific things about my contributions you oppose? If yes, please--at long last--explain them. User23242343 (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Materialscientist already knows your persistent pattern of disruptive editing, for which you have already been reverted several times and warned 4 times since February 2023. You need to assume good faith towards all editors, including me and the user that you keep insulting by stating that he/she couldn't phrase words correctly, which is totally inappropriate and is not true.
Insulting and threathening other users repeatedly is a clear example of bad faith on your part; you won't get anywhere unless you decide to calm down, drop the stick, and leave aside this aggressive attitude of yours while collaborating with other editors on this encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a forum, and this kind of behavior is not tolerated on forums anyway. I have already given you advices about what to do, but you refuse to listen. GenoV84 (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad there are no parts of my changes you oppose and we could settle the matter. User23242343 (talk) 01:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Supreme Court of Justice (Austria)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Supreme Court of Justice (Austria) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 23:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Supreme Court of Justice (Austria)

[edit]

The article Supreme Court of Justice (Austria) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Supreme Court of Justice (Austria) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 11:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cthulhu Mythos deities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supreme deity. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:User23242343&oldid=1231234788"