Koliko dobro znaš bjeloruski ? Koliko je udaljen od ruskog ? Kao slovenski od hrvatskog ? Pogledaj neke tekstove na bjeloruskom, pa procijeni. Zanima me, a nemam dostatnoga znanja. Mir Harven19:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Meni ovo izgleda vrlo različito od ruskog. Od fonetike i fonologije do sinatakse i leksika. http://www.geocities.com/albaruthenia/IA/language.html Ne razumijem zašto Bjelorusi već jednom ne ustroje sveučilišta na svom jeziku, nego se navlače s njima stranim jezikom kakav je ruski. Ukrajinci si to ne bi dopustili. Kao da je u Ljubljani nastavni jezik hrvatski. Svašta Mir Harven21:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vjerujem ja da je to samo privremeno. Kad počne među inteligencijom, nacionalna individualizacija širi se brže ili sporije, no, nezaustavljiva je. Kao što kaže anogedota iz Praga s konca 19. stoljeća: u Gradskoj kavani okupili se ljudi i sjede za stolom. Onda je netko ušao i upitao što bi se dogodilo ako bi im se na glave srušio strop kavane. Odgovor je glasio da bi to bio kraj češkog nacionalnog pokreta. No-strop se nije srušio. Mir Harven20:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mogli su i manji Litavci i Estonci. Bjeloruski je dovoljno individualiziran jezik i potrebna je samo veća agilnost inteligencije. Budimo realni-slati djecu u škole u kojem se uči na jednom stranom jeziku (npr. kao da Česi idu stalno u slovačke škole, ili Hrvati u slovenske, ili Makedonci u srpske, ili Danci u švedske,..)-to nema budućnosti. Mir Harven14:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pa dobro-kako onda govori kod kuće 82% stanovništva Bjelorusije koji se pišu Bjelorusima ? Ovdje piše da Bjelorusi, generalno, govore bjeloruski-Belarusian_language. Kojim onda jezikom u svakodnevnoj komunikaciji govori tih 80% ljudi ? Valjda ne govore svi ruski među sobom ? Na kojem su jeziku časopisi, TV program i sl ? Vidim, što mi izgleda skoro nevjerojatno, da su 2-3 sveučilišta (Minsk itd.)-na ruskom ? Je li to isključivo na ruskom ? To mi izgleda suludo. Mir Harven17:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Е како не разбираш македонски! :-) Сигурен сум дека 100% ме разбираш сега! Јас добар, фала на прашање - штотуку ми заврши еден доста зафатен период - испити на факултет, подготовки за изложба (уште траат), а исто така немав интернет до денес. Инаку, за малку ќе се запознаев со Џимбо Велс, ама човекот го откажа своето патување во Белград во последен момент. И така, весело! :-) Ти како си?
Thanks for your nice words. Nice to meet you too. Hrvatski učiti iz dosade, svaka čast! By the way, ovo 'svaka čast,' ima li tog u engleskom?--Sannya16:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mogao bih navesti ozvor, koji je uostalom vec poznata knjiga Death of Yugoslavia. Ne diram clanak dok ne odgovorite. --VKokielov 02:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Koji članak?:)
--Ceha 19:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
tian Krajina --VKokielov 22:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Nema problema, ako bude bilo što pogrešno, ispraviti ćemo.
--Ceha 15:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
And one note. With due respect, you tend to write obfuscated and difficult to understand text sometimes. I suggest you keep things as simple as possible, and please think very carefully when modifying introductions. You can reply here if you have comments, thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be a good idea to avoid terms like "variables are lifeblood of programs" [1]. This is an encyclopedia, and the style has to be formal, dramatic expressions are not so appropriate, I think. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And you wrote I could revise many of the definitions here to be more precise. You are welcome, but I suggest you take it easy and slowly, at least until you get used to Wikipedia style/conventions. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I undid your change at center (algebra), as that first sentence is supposed to be an informal introduction. There is no need to go to the most general and most mathematical defintion right from the start. The precise statements are below, anyway.
It would be good if you read Wikipedia:Make technical articles accessible. As many new people to Wikipedia, you tend to write things more with your fellow mathematician in mind than the general public I think, and that may not be a good idea. On Wikipedia it is good to keep things as simple as possible while still driving the point home. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for supporting me in my RfA. I really didn't think people appreciate my work here that much, but it's nice to see you do: my Request was closed with 66 supports and 4 opposes. I'll do my best not to turn your confidence down. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to drop me a line. --Dijxtra11:56, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do not welcome your revert of my refactoring. I had already informed Linuxbreak. It was a personal attack and an Ad Hominem. I left a private message on Zmaj's talk page demanding an apology. His comment does only divert from the issue to be discussed. --Asteriontalk to me15:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Quoting from Wikipedia:User page:
In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing another's user page without their permission. Some users are fine with their user pages being edited, and may even have a note to that effect. Other users may object and ask you not to edit their user pages, and it is probably sensible to respect their requests. The best option is to draw their attention to the matter on their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so.
Whether the talk page is public or not, this is irrelevant. It is quite clear HRE did not invite you take that action and you did not seek reassurance either. Regards, --Asteriontalk to me15:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever your actions were, I still assume good faith. Simply pointing out that given the gravity of the matter, this is up to the user and the bureaucrat to sort out by themselves. I am sure Linuxbreak will try to contact HRE and seek reassurance on his intentions. Best regards, --Asteriontalk to me15:49, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refran from making edits like these. This RFA is already high in tension and users are going to start to frown upon these kinds of edits. Moeε00:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, I'll drop the quotations. Heres a blue-link, mind WP:CIVIL. You're opinions, and yes thats what they are, are not needed on an RFA that is already watched like a hawk for POV violations. You furthur commenting on this RFA is not needed. Moeε01:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
While I respect any of you're beliefs and you're reason for opposing, I would just like for you to deal with it without possibly indirectly hurting a users feelings. Moeε01:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I have removed you're edits once again. As I said, please refran from making non-relevant POV statements. You're edits are now borderline trolling. Please refran from adding comments like that again. Moeε01:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. I'm sorry I have stopped being generous with the warnings now. Moeε22:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. TigerShark22:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind that you're not blocked anymore. I would just have liked for you to not POV push so much to the point that you were blocked. Please be more considerate of the polocies next time. Moeε23:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You added me just because I added you. That was vandalism itself. (and if it's not vandalism its a case of WP:POINT). In order for a block to occur on WP:AIV (usually) the editor has to be warned several times for vandalism before a block can occur. Moeε23:26, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your trust and kind words, but I must decline the nomination. My degree of Wikiholism is already higher than I'd like to, and potential adminship would be a burden for me, at least in this moment. In 99% cases, I'm quite happy to go by with my "ordinary contributor" status, and I wouldn't like to be obligated with a task to which I couldn't devote substantial time to do it right. Duja14:48, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pa, nije samo da se Karadzic tamo krije, nego i traze da se tijelo Milosevicevo prebaci u CG. Podsjeca me na Hrvatsku koja trazi Tita. Najbolje bi bilo kada bi Srbija predala sve i ne bi bilo problema - pre par dana je Premijer (Kostunica) ispao budala pred cijelim svijetom zbog Mladica, a drugi najmocniji covjek u drzavi (Labus), podpredsjednik vlade je abdicirao i bjezi u Crnu Goru jer je rekao da se Srbiji vise nista ne moze uciniti - zbog njegove "abdikacije" raspada se i vlada, sto znaci da ce srpski pregovaracki tim u Becu oko Kosova vjerovatno biti opozvan, a i ko zna sto drugo - koalicija za zaustavljanje Radikala (SRS - najcvrsca stranka u drzavi) se raspada. Bilo je bolje za vrijeme NATO intervencije. ;) --HolyRomanEmperor18:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If I recall well, it was agreed that Jacov's conspiracy theory that he keeps putting back at Janjevci is unosurced. If it is, please try to explain to Luka Jačov that he is not behaving properly.
Luka is being extremely stubborn. When I asked him to give reference for his claims, he told to me that I should Read Tudjman's book!!! I suppose all wikipedia readres should also read it instead of him giving some solid reference? Please, try to talk to him or report him to some other admin. --Ante Perkovic09:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite a patient person, but I don't think Jacov's behaviour should be tolerated indefinitly. Could you explain me (I'm no expert on all the nitty-gritty wiki rules) is he in danger of being blocked for a longer period. I wish no evil to noone, but this guy needs to learn the rules in reasonably near future. --Ante Perkovic12:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Gathering votes for what? Don't tell me he has ambition to be an administrator? I coudn't vote against him because I couldn't stop laughing and bring my self to the keyboard. Or the voting was related to something else? --Ante Perkovic12:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
Should he be blocked for this (put it in your ass). He seams to be geting out of control. Maybe he needs few days to cool of, so can can study the rules od wikipedia? --Ante Perkovic09:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And this (no time to discuss, just to revert???) shows that he really can't make him self behave according to the rules.
Funny thing is that Boris protested on croatian wikipedia because someone added link to his webpage on his croatian user page. He called that "vandalizm", and 14h later, he does this to user:CrnaGora.
I don't know it they broke any rules, but if they did, someone should try to explain them that the are not really behaving like honest wikipedians. I tried to talk to them, but no use, they don't listen.
Ah, nevermind. I was just stopping by to say "hello". I came back again, but you weren't there, again. Anyways, I didn't have anything important to say. :-) Regards. --FlavrSavr21:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your addition to Prescription and description. Just to clarify: was the Soviet prescription organised by statute or by government agencies? In that case, can you please expand a little to say so? Or did the prescription come from informal linguistics gurus? In this case, your comment belongs in the paragraph above. Thanks. --Doric Loon09:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose You already know what I think. But it will be well to add in passing that you're throwing mud into Joy's face. --VKokielov 23:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
user:Dado has created some new Bosnia locator maps, but without entities marked (except badly visible inter-entity line). I think this is a bad idea, so I created my own maps, with separate colors for each entity (we have that already, but those maps are in low resolution and small).
I couldn't reach a compromise with Dado, and I believe we need third opinion.
I have reverted vandalism in your userpage twice today. If the situation continues, you may well consider requesting semiprotection to stop anonymous edits. I am not an admin but I am sure you could find someone willing to help you out. Regards, E Asterionu talking to me?21:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please cool off. I restored your edits together with those sentences which you deleted without explanation. In your last version, the article read like an apology to the British imperialism. Happy edits, Ghirla-трёп-08:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the Ottomans weren't only Turks, they were the ruling Muslim millet (class), and there were other Muslims in the empire (Slavic and Albanian converts, Arabs, etc.) that had the same rights because of their religion.
Hi, I found you through the list of translators. I noticed the Serbian wiki has granted FA status to their Liberalism article and hoped you wouldn't mind either improving Liberalism or simply throwing some ideas to everyone on the talk page. Thanks! Xaxafrad03:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm most interested to know more about your point about the influence of Celtic on the continuous tenses. I thought it was Germanic, although I have no firm evidence. The edit needs a reference. Tony15:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! Thanks for that—how fascinating. I want to know more, so I'll search for those books in the library. Tony16:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
15:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
15:49, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
