User talk:Valkiriye95

Welcome!

Hi Valkiriye95! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Darwinek (talk) 02:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Why Russia is not America

Hello, Valkiriye95,

Thank you for creating Why Russia is not America.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The (online) second reference is about Nigeria. What is the relevance of Nigeria to this book?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru:, the Smirnov book And Why Is Russia Not Nigeria? was written as a rebuttal to Parshev's claims about Russia's geographical distinctness. It is available online here, where there is also a précis of the work. Smirnov challenges the concept that Russia's geographical situation prevents its development along the lines of other countries, including Nigeria, and so this is presumably why the title was selected. Can I ask that if there are other factual inaccuracies in the article that you've spotted, that you raise them on the talkpage, where they can be discussed by other editors, and if not, remove the tag? Spokoyni (talk) 22:10, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spokoyni: The PDF file would not load on page review. Hence the reference was challenged as inappropriate. The link above was examined and provides sufficient to your point. Tag dropped. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Proza.ru

The article Proza.ru has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mhawk10 (talk) 02:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stock market in Russia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stock market in Russia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://adamfayed.com/how-to-invest-in-stocks-in-russia-2021/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Translation requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from ru:Фондовый рынок в России to Stock market in Russia. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Hague Conference (1922)

Hello, Valkiriye95,

Thank you for creating The Hague Conference (1922).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Hague Conference (1922) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Hague Conference (1922), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 21:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet grain exports moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Soviet grain exports. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Hague Conference (1922)

Hello, Valkiriye95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Hague Conference (1922), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Soviet grain exports

Hello, Valkiriye95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soviet grain exports, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Hague Conference (1922)

Hello, Valkiriye95. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Hague Conference".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Soviet grain exports

Hello, Valkiriye95. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Soviet grain exports".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Larry moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jan Larry. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jan Larry

Hello, Valkiriye95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jan Larry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jan Larry

Hello, Valkiriye95. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jan Larry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]