User talk:VeritasIpsumLoquitor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

VeritasIpsumLoquitor, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi VeritasIpsumLoquitor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

May 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mlpearc. An edit that you recently made to Adolf Hitler seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Adolf Hitler‎. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Dr. K. 00:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elon Musk. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please refrain from reverting constructive edits, or provide evidence that said edits are "disruptive", thank you. VeritasIpsumLoquitor (talk) 22:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Elon Musk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]