User talk:Visuunome
--visu unome 13:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
August 2012
[edit]
Hello, I'm Biker Biker. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Automotive industry in India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 07:04, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- thanks for adding more up-to-date references. It would be helpful if you did not use bare URLs. Take a look at the {{cite web}} template and use that to properly format and cite your sources. If you want to quickly fix the bad ones you added so far then use the following tool - http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py --Biker Biker (talk) 08:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
I am being neutral
[edit]Wat makes u think sections relating to a film's post release events are biased? I had not shown any preference/dislike to the content I added, and thot it was neutral enough to elevate the article's class status. Articles Ra.One (a Gud article) and Players (film) also hav similar sections, why don't u remove those also? Kailash29792 (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Do not indulge in vandalism
[edit]It has been observed that you have been reverting from a better summarized version to a confusing wiki article on ajithkumar. Request you to stop it with imediate effect.To reach consensus you can discuss in talk page isntead of reverting!Onceshook1 (talk) 04:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Its also clear that you have contributed till today from december 2011 only in wiki articles related to ajith kumar's films. so its clear you are a fan. do not resort to reverting without any logical reasoning.the present version is also a clean version and its just that few lines which were contradictory were removed and better summarized version has been put. the information which was there earlier is same as now but only difference is the way it has been conveyed. Onceshook1 (talk) 04:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- It is wrong to call Visuunome's edits vandalism, but your point is well made otherwise. The removal of a large section of content in the article Billa II is a good example of bad editing. --Biker Biker (talk) 05:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
awards n nomination section you had created table format for better viewing and i appreciate that and you can just copy paste that portion again back no issues as its for betterment of the article.Onceshook1 (talk) 06:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Also another point would like to clear - ajithkumar's father is a Hindu Brahmin from Palakkad ie. Pallakad Iyer Brahmin. Source http://ajithkumar.free.fr/filmographie/inter33.htm.So the claim that there is some race issue is basless claim.Onceshook1 (talk) 06:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Dear nothing personal against you. But Wikipedia doesn't take words of people in video, it wants SOLID PROOF and as of now, the word of mouth is NOT proof enough.There are more sources saying P.Subramanian is Pallakad Hindu Iyer Brahmin.Onceshook1 (talk) 06:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Source above I provided is interview of Ajithkumar.Onceshook1 (talk) 06:38, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
[edit] Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Please do not throw around accusations of vandalism when the edits in question clearly are not. Biker Biker (talk) 05:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ajith Kumar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Others and Asal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm Best in the world 56. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ajith Kumar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Best in the world 56 (talk) 07:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- You got it wrong. Read WP:BLP which states,
- "Contentious material about living persons (or in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material :is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."
- Also read WP:burden.
- Best in the world 56 (talk) 15:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Warning: No more personal attacks please
[edit]Baseless accusations of vandalism are personal attacks, and baseless accusations of racial discrimination are worse personal attacks. Please stop attacking editors or you will be blocked from editing. Note also that personal attacks in edit summaries are worse, because they cannot easily be removed. Bishonen | talk 09:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC).