User talk:Volsini

This is Volsini's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Volsini/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Volsini! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Pyrgi Tablets, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody has seen the article , thats what is importan to me , no professor knows the language so i dont expect it to be be published , at least somebody has seen it. Volsini (talk) 06:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The public don't see the sand box omly those 'tentive terrible ' interpretations that are put up. Volsini (talk) 01:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Velthuru (now "Vosini"): Sockpuppetry, creating new accounts to avoid detection or sanctions, is a serious breach of community trust. It may lead to: --a block of all related accounts --a ban of the user (the sockmaster or sockpuppeteer) behind the accounts (each of which is a sockpuppet or sock) on-project exposure of all accounts and IP addresses used across Wikipedia and its sister projects --the (potential) public exposure of any "real-world" activities or personal information deemed relevant to preventing future sockpuppetry or certain other abuses. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry Johundhar (talk) 09:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

forgot my password for volturu , so I began again as volsini. Volsini (talk) 01:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Cippus Perusinus, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Materialscientis. Unfortunately, Volsini (formerly Velthuru) is a serial disruptive editor. S/He has been warned (see above) and can take this as a further warning that s/he could be blocked if s/he continues with nonconstructive, disruptive edits.Johundhar (talk) 15:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the procedure of giving references as long as they dont have copywright material but I cant give references to any professors as there is not one whether it is da beers or any other as there is not one who actually knows the Etruscan language so it is hard for m to meet the brief of wicki. Volsini (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golini Tomb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eita. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The name Eita is correct if you wish to check the inscriptions in the Tomb. Volsini (talk) 01:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liver of Piacenza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Golini Tomb, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sir Nuttingham (talk) 13:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

understood Volsini (talk) 16:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Golini Tomb. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Golini Tomb. - Arjayay (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]