User talk:WMLab999

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to IPad Pro has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: IPad Pro was changed by WMLab999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904411 on 2017-06-12T02:08:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Apple community. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Apple community was changed by WMLab999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967043 on 2017-06-12T02:12:31+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 02:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WMLab999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions instead. WMLab999 (talk) 13:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WMLab999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because I
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. I will make useful contributions instead. WMLab999 (talk) 13:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A simple (copy-pasted) answer is not sufficient. Please tell us why, in your opinion, you have been blocked, and what contributions you intend to make in the future if unblocked.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are showing you know how to copy and paste. But that's not going to get you unblocked. Please immediately take down that unblock request until you can replace it with something sensible. See WP:GAB if you need help. --Yamla (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WMLab999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise that the block is no longer necessary to prevent vandalism, and I will not make disruptive edits anymore, and I will make constructive edits instead. (NOTE: this does not convince to copy and paste, it convinces that I will stop disrupting Wikipedia). After I get unblocked, I would edit any page. WMLab999 (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're just trolling now. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

remember: My text wasn't copy-pasted: I just entered the {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. text, and added a non-copy pasted answer. Note: My username does not violate your username policy. WMLab999 (talk) 02:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are obviously just wasting our time, so I have revoked your access to this talk page for the duration of your block. --Yamla (talk) 12:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]