User talk:WelcomeLifeAllFriends

This is WelcomeLifeAllFriends's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imad Royal (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please identify your WP:THREE best articles on Royal and his career. Needs more links to the artists. The production singles should not be in bold.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Imad Royal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Imad Royal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WelcomeLifeAllFriends! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imad Royal (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove genius.com links. Also still need to show WP:THREE sources to show notability for the musician.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Imad Royal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Imad Royal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:06, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chia seed, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I was not aware that this wiki article was closely monitored. Nothing is mentioned about the possible or likely health benefits of chia seeds... it is generally believed to be a superfood.

We're an encyclopedia--we don't do "it is generally believed". It's also generally believed that "Ring a Ring o' Roses" is some sort of leftover song from the plague epidemics in the Middle Ages. Zefr pointed you to WP:MEDRS. I see your post on the talk page (please sign your posts), and that's a start--but what you cited in this edit, "lifehack.org" and "healthline.com", those are not acceptable. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Individual foods do not confer specific health benefits or anti-disease effects. The nutrients supplied in a mixed-food diet support health (see Human nutrition). The term superfood exists only in the marketing world to persuade gullible consumers to part with their money - perspective here. Zefr (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]