User talk:Wikeditwikeditwikedit

November 2016

Hello, I'm Haminoon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Basuki Tjahaja Purnama without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- haminoon (talk) 04:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. -- haminoon (talk) 08:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Basuki Tjahaja Purnama. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikeditwikeditwikedit, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wikeditwikeditwikedit! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Basuki Tjahaja Purnama ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- haminoon (talk) 22:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Basuki Tjahaja Purnama ‎. -- haminoon (talk) 22:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Haminoon. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Basuki Tjahaja Purnama ‎ seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- haminoon (talk) 22:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Basuki Tjahaja Purnama ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- haminoon (talk) 22:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Basuki Tjahaja Purnama. -- haminoon (talk) 01:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Basuki Tjahaja Purnama. -- haminoon (talk) 01:57, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Basuki Tjahaja Purnama

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! XyzSpaniel Talk Page 08:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]