User talk:WikiSantashines

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:WikiSantashines/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:WikiSantashines/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 14:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, WikiSantashines! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 14:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, WikiSantashines, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

September 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Tallukh, from its old location at User:WikiSantashines/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Paid editing?

Hello WikiSantashines. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WikiSantashines. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WikiSantashines|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 10:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

@Theroadislong:No, i am not being paid for anything, i have a tendency to complete something that i have started before moving on to another article. That is the sole reason of working behind the same thing for such a duration of time. I hope it is clear now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSantashines (talk • contribs) 11:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

 Note: @Theroadislong: Please see this previous undeletion request on Commons. WikiSantashines has affirmed that they are the owner of ANURAGJHA CREATIONS which produced Tallukh, the subject of the article in question. Emailing them via the official website was offered as proof. I hope this clarifies the situation a little further. Crep171166 (talk) 12:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

@Crep171166: Are you keeping track of me ? That whenever I successfully do something you have to show up to make everything go wrong and get whatever I try go to waste ? What’s your problem with me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSantashines (talk • contribs) 19:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tallukh (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tallukh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tallukh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

paid editing again

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:WikiSantashines, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WikiSantashines|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. see here [1] Theroadislong (talk) 16:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Done Happy ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSantashines (talk • contribs) 19:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm not keen on the way you have handled this. @Theroadislong:No, i am not being paid for anything, i have a tendency to complete something that i have started before moving on to another article. That is the sole reason of working behind the same thing for such a duration of time. I hope it is clear now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSantashines (talk • contribs) 11:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC) differs greatly from Done Happy ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSantashines (talk • contribs) 19:49, 7 October 2020. Even so you have got there finally.

Above, you have asked Crep171166 if they are keeping an eye on you. The answer is that everyone's edits are able to be scrutinised by any editor at any time. It's evident that your initial denial and subsequent admission of paid editing show an attitude that I interpret, as may others, as being contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. You appear to be here as a promotion only account. That warrants editors keeping an eye on you. Fiddle Faddle 19:38, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tallukh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tallukh. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 19:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi WikiSantashines! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Why is it taking too long for articles to get reviewed ?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)