User talk:Wikilord369

October 2018

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Dreamkeeper— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dreamkeeper. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:48, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dreamkeeper, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dreamkeeper was changed by Wikilord369 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928416 on 2018-10-16T15:50:19+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:50, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at How to Eat Fried Worms (film).
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: How to Eat Fried Worms (film) was changed by Wikilord369 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952745 on 2018-10-16T15:56:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Osage County, Oklahoma. JumpiMaus (talk) 16:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikilord369 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am sorry for what i did and it was stupid of me for doing it. I should of listened and it wont happen again.i was trying to be funny and now i regret it.i will be nore mature and think before i edit. Wikilord369 (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that you didn't bother to do anything except vandalize, and really stupidly at that, I'm not sure that the passing of three hours has turned you into a desirable Wikipedia editor. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 20:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please take into consideration Wikilord369 (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What constructive edits might you make>? WP:Community portal has lists of articles that need improvement.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How long

How long is my block Wikilord369 (talk) 20:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]