User talk:Wikipediaeditperson

Wikipediaeditperson, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wikipediaeditperson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, I'm Sro23. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Maty Noyes without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sro23 (talk) 16:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maty Noyes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you're having problems with visual editor, you can disable it. In your preferences, go to "editing" and and check "Temporarily disable the visual editor while it is in beta". Sro23 (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

I wanted to say good job with improving the Maty Noyes page and sorry for the confusion yesterday on my talk page. I'm glad you got the edits done the way you were looking to. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toro Rosso 2017 Engines

Although Toro Rosso will use Renault engines for 2017, we don't know what name the engine will have. For example, Red Bull have "Tag Heuer" branded engines, and so Toro Rosso's might be branded by a sponsor too. It was agreed here to list them as TBA until we know what name they'll give the engines. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most importantly no power unit supplier is listed on FIA's entry list. That's why we can't include one.T v x1 16:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2017 Formula One season. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. T v x1 16:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2017 Formula One season. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. There is a discussion on the matter on the article's talk page. It explains why he is counted for Australia. T v x1 18:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please check your sources before making edits. formula1.com is managed by FOM, and FOM is completely separate to the FIA. It has no regulatory powers of its own. Every other source on the halo makes it clear that the rules must be ratified by the WMSC before they become a part of the technical regulations. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 12:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you need to read your sources. The source that you have provided only references the Strategy Working Group, which is not part of the FIA. The rules regarding the halo still need to be approved by the WMSC before they become a part of the technical regulations. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 12:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2018 Formula One season. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 12:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Wikipediaeditperson reported by User:Tvx1 (Result: ). Thank you. T v x1 14:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 14:44, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't forget to sign your posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:2018 Formula One season, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thanks. -- de Facto (talk). 08:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

F1 2017

Please stop pinging me in this discussion. I have nothing more to say on the subject and wish to take no further part. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Au/Ra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Au/Ra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Au/Ra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wikipediaeditperson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rani (Dutch singer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rani (Dutch singer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rani (Dutch singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]