User talk:Wikiwriter639

Ryan Morrison

See wp:KDL Adakiko (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, the citation 12 is a dead link and I couldn't find any other articles to support this. I suggest we leave it off. Wikiwriter639 (talk) 18:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read wp:KDL, aka Keep Dead Links? Policy is to leave them. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know this. Either way the information isn't backed by any real sources and should be removed. Wikiwriter639 (talk) 21:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Ryan Morrison while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly! Wikiwriter639 (talk) 16:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice

There are quite a few articles on this.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ryan Morrison. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 11:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Wikiwriter639. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastien Lagree (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sebastien Lagree and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikiwriter639! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

As you have refused to declare your conflict of interest (WP:COI) and appear only to be interested in advertising, I have blocked you indefinitely.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla (talk) 12:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not a promoter, I am a newer wikipedian trying to contribute to the best of my ability. I have properly cited every source I have used and have followed the guidelines very carefully. I love being on here and really hope you will reconsider. Thank you so much, Tyler Wikiwriter639 (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read the directions in the orange box above. Read and understand wp:Guide to appealing blocks. Not following such directions could indicate a problem. Your editing on Jeff Leach (page history) consisted of a number of promotional edits. Your last edit to Jeff Leach here included adding marking the inception of a lifelong passion, began his acting journey, and standout. This is not wp:neutral-sounding content. It is also not in the source and would be considered wp:original research (OR) or wp:synthesis. I would suggest you should explain why what you wrote would be considered propaganda and/or advocacy and why it will not happen again. You probably should read / familiarize yourself with how not to be a spammer, and Help:Introduction. Given that you have primarily edited Jeff Leach, you would likely be considered a wp:single purpose account (spa). You probably should avoid editing Jeff Leach for a while. I'm not an expert in this area, so I've probably left much out. Best of luck! Adakiko (talk) 19:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastien Lagree (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SunDawn was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sebastien Lagree and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sebastien Lagree

Hello, Wikiwriter639. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sebastien Lagree".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]