User talk:Wiktor.jachec

Wiktor.jachec, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wiktor.jachec! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Spam tracking

datantify.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.datantify.com

October 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Faurecia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Begoon 12:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Deutsche Bahn. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Begoon 12:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Starbucks. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Begoon 12:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiktor.jachec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

> Hello, I'm contacting you because I've got a ban on your service. I was accused of spamming the datantify.com links, however, this is an unfounded accusation because the data that I updated came from the current database of companies made a month ago (09.2019). All obsolete data from 2018 or older was updated by me. I provided an information link to the changed data so that the reader or moderator could verify where the data are downloaded from. In some discussions, people even wrote that from where people have data to the number of employees, etc. - adding a link provides an answer to this question. I ask you to give me a positive opinion on my case and if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Decline reason:

This was blatant spam. This was not an unfounded accusation, you were blatantly spamming this link to a company you work for. We don't like spammers here. You have broken our terms of service and won't be unblocked to continue your spam campaign. Yamla (talk) 09:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please tell the rest of your company to stop spamming Wikipedia, too, or we'll blacklist your entire site. --Yamla (talk) 10:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiktor.jachec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I update only old data. This platform was created to learn people, why they cannot see updated data? I don't understand this situation. Can I have a second chance? I want to help people not to spam! Wiktor.jachec (talk) 10:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. MER-C 16:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You want to help people not to spam... by... spamming links to your company site?!? Is this really what you are saying?!? --Yamla (talk) 11:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiktor.jachec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand. I update unique information that will enrich the knowledge of users and the value of the site using verified data that has been reported by our company. The data it updates is the most up-to-date and we additionally supplement the data such as the number of chain stores in Poland (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supermarket_chains_in_Poland). The link gives so that it is known what the source is and so that the person concerned can check the data provided.

Additionally, I do not understand why you banned too my supervisor Maburzynski's account - this is the person responsible for customer support.

Please understand that all actions taken on my site were not intended to spam the link, the more so that we are aware that the links on this platform have a no-follow tag. Wiktor.jachec (talk) 14:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. The decision to include links to datantify.com is not yours to make because you have a conflict of interest. MER-C 16:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Which part of WP:COI are you finding difficult to understand? --Yamla (talk) 14:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]