User talk:WooBrown2012

My official talk page.WooBrown2012 (talk) 01:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, WooBrown2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 15:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Dan56. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Perfectly Imperfect, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 15:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect information/deletion of sourced info

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 12:08, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

more blanking

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Fortune (album), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - eo (talk) 11:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Succession box edits

Please dont use the header "procession and succession" when adding these boxes. They are technically called succession boxes, and "succession" already suggests an order in a sequence, before or after, so the "procession" is a bit redundant and makes the header overlong. Dan56 (talk) 19:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm STATicVerseatide. Your recent edit to the page Long. Live. ASAP appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 16:14, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of number-one R&B albums of 2013 (U.S.), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fantasia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confessions (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give List of number-one rap albums of 2013 (U.S.) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into List of Billboard number-one rap albums of 2013. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for impersonating an admin by placing false block notices and sockpuppeteer tags. Any admin can unblock this user when he agrees to deal with his conflicts via discussion rather than disruption.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 23:00, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WooBrown2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked because I'm trying to place sections on articles, but they're all removed. WooBrown2012 (talk) 15:30, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|reason= I want the block to be no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for. [[User:WooBrown2012|WooBrown2012]] ([[User talk:WooBrown2012#top|talk]]) 19:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)}}

Both of these requests are utter garbage that look like no though whatsoever went into them. You are either trolling or you lack the basic level of competence required to edit in an environment such as this. At the end of the day it doesn't matter which it is, you shouldn't be editing here. I am therefore revoking your ability to edit this talk page. If you wish to appeal this block further please contact WP:BASC by email. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]