User talk:Xkdx

April 2018

Hello, I'm Noah Kastin. I noticed that you recently removed content from Naagin (TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 05:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Naagin (TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 08:20, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Surbhi Jyoti, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] Note also that caste must be derived from self-identification, not inferred through surnames or other means. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this content is just ridiculous. "Loves cleanliness"? Really? Is a big fan of Hugh Jackman and adores him? Poor redundant writing, but also not encyclopedic content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Surbhi Jyoti Photoshoot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Surbhi Jyoti Photoshoot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this edit, if you don't know what a template like {{As of}} is for, you shouldn't be deleting it. "Currently" is a meaningless word in the context of a global encyclopedia. A casual reader will have no idea if "currently" was written today, or ten years ago. That's why we use clear language like {{As of|2018|09}} which renders as "As of September 2018^[update]". This makes it super-clear when the claim in the article was made, i.e. September 2018. If the As of date were a while back like 2015, the reader could estimate that maybe the information is no longer current. This template also adds the article to a hidden category of articles with ephemeral statements, so that people familiar with the show can update the claim if they are so motivated. Does this all make sense to you? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Surbhi Jyoti Picture.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Surbhi Jyoti Picture.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Surbhi Jyoti Photoshoot.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Surbhi Jyoti Photoshoot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Surbhi Jyoti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]