User talk:Yamamoto Ichiro/Archives/3

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Domo Arigato

Thansk for the revert on my talk page. I can see a block request coming up for Mr Halstram! Tonywalton | Talk 17:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my page. By the way you are really very quick on reverting pages:) Keep up the good work--Ugur Basak 01:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. --James S. 02:40, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti Vandal Activity

Your efforts at stomping out vandalism are greatly appreciated. Thanks!

-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 04:14, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism

User talk:71.32.156.67 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Jump to: navigation, search

This message is regarding the article History of Vermont. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. - Ichiro 07:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

If you look at the editing changes at: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Vermont&diff=prev&oldid=35122223

You will see that I removed a sentence stating "Vermont is gay."

You apparently determined this was "unhelpful" and put it back in: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Vermont&diff=prev&oldid=35372080

And someone else has now taken it out. So much for me patrolling vandalism.

Chris B 04:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)71.32.156.67 04:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 27 January 2006 9:18pm mountain US timezone[reply]

Sorry, that was a mistake. --Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 04:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i think that vermoont is not you know what and you should not say that :)

Unsigned Comment

Dont tell me what to do —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.134.104.146 (talk • contribs) .

my rfa

thanks for your support on my rfa Benon 07:06, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdo

I just tried to revert Andy Kaufman and you beat me to it. Good work.--71.28.250.210 08:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

user/usertalk

hi, I see you just marked a comment I left for a new user for speedy delate as I left it on the user page by accident instead of the talk page. That's a bit harsh, no? Mistakes happen. Have moved it to talk page, and removed it (and sd) from user page) MartinRe 00:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, i see. Don't know how that happened. Thought I was leaving note on user page (followed link as normal from article comment). Next time might be better for you to leave a note explaining deletion request (which I now agree with, btw) as my initial thought was user/user talk problem. After all, people can't stop making mistakes unless we're told what they are! MartinRe 00:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned Comment

How come Ican't do that —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.41.140.63 (talk • contribs) .

Hey

Please stop removing my changes.

With much much much love,

Garry Newman xxxxxxx

<33333 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.51.31.151 (talk • contribs) .

Your changes were seen as vandalism and they don't help at all, that's why they were removed. --Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 05:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sandbox

ya i vandalised a few times cuase i was bored and yoy told me to use sandbox what is sandbox? and how can i help prevent vandalism, because i'm bored i would love to help accomplish somthing —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.30.173.162 (talk • contribs) .

?

Who did i attack with slander, i am ryan long, hopkins can say what he wants and i will responde, then the day after erase the posts. Led-zep. p.s. i still dont know what i did. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.82.9.76 (talk • contribs) .

sry , but........

but i want to delet that picture wich is sensetive for muslims , and i am trying to do that , muslims will be more anger . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.201.197.41 (talk • contribs) .

Thanks

I think that's my first time! I must be doing something right. Thanks for reverting it. James James 04:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned comments: a great feat

Wow, your talk page almost has as many unsigned comments as mine. If only there was an award for that. (probably there should be). Best, El_C 04:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned Comment

yes man , but that is a RELIGION , not a game , understand me? a relegion for more than 1.5 Bln relegions must be in the besind , we must respect religion ,

what if somebody puts an image to jesus in a bad way , what will u do?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.201.197.41 (talk • contribs) .

take care

you said "i belife" , where is others? are you alone in that world? as i respect ur belives, u must also respect mine. where is democracy? where is your answer for my question about jesus?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.201.197.41 (talk • contribs) .

no man , i dont want a blank page , i just want to remove that pic only ,

That's it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.201.197.41 (talk • contribs) .

ok , but

i cant find the way to delete the picture , 05:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Edmonton users

sweet! Thanks! Sasquatcht|c 05:17, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Previously Unsigned

I put my signature in the one below. Sorry.

That's okay, at least you signed your comment anyways :p Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 01:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree

You are pretty quick on the revert. I wanted to get rid of the comments because my little brother was using this computer when I got the messages. Is that bad that I don't want to atone for his crimes? 209.137.182.35 01:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does that mean I can get rid of them without your jumping on it again? 209.137.182.35 01:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for moving my comment. :) čĥàñľōŕď 05:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Clarke for speedy delete

You wrote that this article was not appropriate for speedy deletion. Is this because of the link later added on the discussion page, or was it wrongly nominated in the first place? Just curious, trying to learn the ropes. Makemi 06:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, just wanted to make sure I understood. Makemi 06:47, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi

um how do i revert something to someone else's edit quickly? (i.e for vandalism)? Dog Eat Dog World

helpme

i don't get what to do with the toolsDog Eat Dog World 23:11, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hiuh

we be too beee noo naaahh neeee noooo gooot aalal get it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.255.21.116 (talk • contribs) .

Sorry for vandalizing the Halo 2 pages and the Tarzan page yesterday, Mr.Ichiro. Now i`ve come to my senses and I want to start writng articles and make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. Sincerely, 4.153.2.35--4.153.2.35 11:59, 4 Febuary 2006

About RfA

I think there is a common courtesy here on Wikipedia, that when you have a failed RfA, that you should wait a little while before trying again. In almost all instances, the issues raised in a failed RfA are unlikely to have disappeared in less than one month's time. I think we do a disservice to WP to try again so soon. In this specific instance, Aranda left in a huff and didn't think he would be able to effectively use his sysop tools. I haven't seen much that would show he still doesn't think this way, and the short time period just multiplies the problems. Like I said, he's a good editor, but a little too unpredictable, and seemingly impatient. I hope this explains my feelings to a degree. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks, my friend. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 17:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I know you aren't the person running for adminship, but you were the one who asked the question, so I figured you were the one who should get an answer. It might just be a personal preference, but it is the way I feel. Cheers. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 17:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drawn Together

Why did you revert my changes? I only wanted to be more specific. -- 24.205.175.76 18:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

trotskyism

nonsense, why should the ist and the swp be subjected to criticism from people hostile to it's tradition while other groups do not get criticised? In terms of 'debate' within the trotskyist movement, there are controversies within all groups, not just the swp or the ist. Criticism of the swp on it's position relating to George Galloway and Respect will be better suited to be found within the respective seperate pages for George Galloway, the SWP, IST and RESPECT, not within the Trotskyist page which is supposed to give a broad introduction to Trotskyism, and relating to UK trotskyism information that the SWP is largest Trotskyist group in the UK, further information could be quite easily be found on disagreements within the trotskyist movement.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.158.235.16 (talk • contribs) .

thanks

Thanks for catching the vandalism on the Jun Choi page. Apparently it was going on while you were reverting - and continued once after you moved on. I'm keeping an eye on that user, too. I think he or she stopped, since the last change was yesterday. Where are you based, in NJ? Bruxism 02:16, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I deduced it was vandalism because the IP and the time of entry was the same. Also, it was a negative comment and kind of a pointless one - making a judgment about a mayor's job performance after one month in office is hardly worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Even had it come from someone else, it would have been of questionable value. By the way, what's an RC? And how do you locate vandalism? So interesting how labor is divided in the whole Wikipedia process. Bruxism 23:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not fair

I do not feel it is fair of you to undo my edittings in such a manner. This is a user friendly site and my changes can be validly made. Frankly looking through other comments you have received I do not stand alone, Ichiro. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.33.80.52 (talk • contribs) .

I have not seen one positive edit you have made in your contribution history. Your changes have strong POV in them, and you also removed contents without explanation. They are both classified as vandalism. --Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 02:22, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your notices are quite rude and frank. I believe that nothing good comes out of your planiness.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.33.80.52 (talk • contribs) .

Clone Commanders from Star Wars

The content I removed was incorrect and irrelevant to the subject

It was from the Clone Commanders page, and it had references to Commander Cody being a jedi and some Commanders that were not featured in either the movies or the Expanded Universe —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.14.217.173 (talk • contribs) .

Microsoft Zone

Thanks for dealing with that vandal. If you're an admin, please ban that IP. Thanks! --Candide, or Optimism 05:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

When I was vandalizing pages, I threatened to kill you, RexNl, and D-day. I'm no longer a vandal, but I apologize for offending the people that I did. So please accept my apology and I will no longer vandalize my favorite Website! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.96.23.7 (talk • contribs) .

Then, welcome to Wikipedia :) --Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 22:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

history is important..

try correcting a clone here [[1]]

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting that vandalism :-) —Kirill Lok s hin 03:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for advertising

I was posting content that I thought would be useful. I didn't realize that I was violating policy and didn't notice the "messages" about the violation until afterwards. I apologize for compromising your service.

If there is a way I can add content to your site about various topics, please let me know. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.34.134.216 (talk • contribs) .

Reverting vandal activity

Barnstar for quickly reverting vandalism on my user page

Wow! Thanks for stepping in to revert the recent vandal on my user page. I'm left wondering where the #&!! that came from, but I'm grateful to you for your quick action. Have a barnstar on me! -- SwissCelt 18:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

I've added a new suspected sock to Category:Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets of Brian Brockmeyer, User:CaneMan. -Will Beback 07:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like he is now posting under the IP 66.254.238.240 AriGold 21:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint

I'm not pleased that you subst-ed out my navigator bar on my userpage. Please don't do it again. - ElAmericano (dímelo) 16:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, no worries. ;) - ElAmericano (dímelo) 20:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks!

Thank you!
Hello Yamamoto Ichiro/Archives/3, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 98/2/0. If there is anything I can do to help you, please leave me a message on my talk page! -- xaosflux ^Talk

Thanks

Well aren't you popular. :D

Thanks for reverting Omega-Level Mutants and messaging that user. They always do that complete deletion thing and put in the mutants they regard as Omega.

Originalsinner 04:28, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Why are you being mean to me? Why is UKPaolo being mean too? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bling-chav (talk • contribs) .

Message to Y. Ichiro

The young gentleman who has made changes to this page (Barney List) is autistic and is not intentionally vandalizing your page. He actually gains true enjoyment and calm while on the computer. Thank you for your understanding and patience. I am not completely clear on the workings of Wikipedia nor the exact site he is using, but it appeared to be one that he enjoyed typing his Barney titles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.126.226.61 (talk • contribs) .

Wallace Stevens Poll

This is to invite you to respond to the editors poll on the Wallace Stevens talk page at Talk:Wallace_Stevens#Editors_Poll. You have either contributed to the talk page or have made a substantial contribution to the encyclopedia page within the past three months. Thank you. --Halcatalyst 01:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi, how do you catch vandalism so fast? Is there a tool for it? --James 01:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping! --James 01:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned Comment

You recently accused me of vandalism for posting 'incorrect' information.

here are links to reputable news sources to confirm the information I added to the two biographies which are incorrect for their ommissions. I assume you are not familiar with the two men in question or their actions, however I am thank you!

Laurance Dallagio's drug dealing.

http://newswww.bbc.net.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/may/24/newsid_2503000/2503183.stm

Martin Johnsons insult to the Irish President

http://www.the-kingdom.ie/news/story.asp?j=8782 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.57.235.3 (talk • contribs) .

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.