User talk:Zackiegirl

Welcome!

Hello, Zackiegirl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  N^oformation ^Talk 22:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Dandenong, Victoria has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dandenong, Victoria was changed by Zackiegirl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944447 on 2014-01-22T07:59:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Websites such as:

• http://www.ageofautism.com
• http://www.wesupportandywakefield.com

are likely not going to be considered reliable sources. That's why edits using those sites as references are likely to be reverted. You can read this to get a good idea what would be considered reliable sources for medicine related articles:

• WP:MEDRS

--Harizotoh9 (talk) 23:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

3RR

Please review WP:EDITWAR, WP:BRD and WP:3RR; if you continue to reinstate text after it has been reverted, you could be blocked by an admin. Please discuss your proposed additions at Talk:Andrew Wakefield. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Andrew Wakefield. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Daffydavid (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Andrew Wakefield. Seaphoto^Talk 03:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nsk92 (talk) 03:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for POV pushing, edit warring--pursuant to ANI thread. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 04:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)