User talk:Zaha5516

February 2016

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mansaf, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Boomer Vial^Holla 12:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. You are removing sources information under pretenses that violate WP:NPOV. You're also violating WP:SOCK by using multiple IPs as well as an account to edit. Please at least try and read our policies before editing. Boomer Vial^Holla 12:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Zaha5516 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! LoudLizard (📞 | contribs) 12:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mansaf has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mansaf was changed by Zaha5516 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912969 on 2016-03-12T15:47:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop what you are doing at Mansaf; you need to explain what you want, not just make the same edit over and over

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Mansaf.

You have been repeatedly warned against removing mention of Palestine from the article Mansaf. We do not care if it is your personal opinion that the dish is only Jordanian, and not also Palestinian, since we have multiple and reputable citations showing that the dish is associated with Palestine (and several other countries) in addition to Jordan, and that the dish's "official" status in Jordan is actually quite recent rather than ancient, per at least one well-cited scholar.

You have made zero effort to provide any evidence that your assertion is right, you keep trying to force your viewpoint in by making edits over and over again, wasting the time of other editors. If you do not stop right now, I will request that your account be blocked for unhelpful editing, and any new accounts you make to get around the block will also be blocked. If you want to contribute constructively, please go to Talk:Mansaf and post a section clearly explaining why "Palestinian" should be removed from the article, with clear citations to reputable published works, not just "this is how I want it to be". We cannot change articles to match personal preferences, we must cite all claims to reliable sources. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:27, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are wasting everyone's time, I have reported you for vandalism and requested your account be locked. If you make a new account and keep playing your same game, we can lock that account too, and if need be we can freeze the article Mansaf so that only long-established users can edit it. This is simply ridiculous, and since you refuse to actually communicate with anyone about this we have to take these steps. MatthewVanitas (talk) 11:47, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Mansaf. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. BethNaught (talk) 11:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]