User talk:Zeddeer
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Civmec
[edit]Hello, Zeddeer,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Civmec, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
John B123 (talk) 19:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civmec (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Robert McClenon (talk) 06:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
[edit]![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. MER-C 15:31, 26 December 2020 (UTC)![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Zeddeer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked on by User:MER-C, having been accused of Using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes, likely covert advertising
on the basis that I added an article that was previously deleted largely because it was written with primary cites. The version I added bore no resemblance to the deleted article [1] vs [2] being written exclusively with secondary cites. If I was seeking to promote the company. then I did an awful job of it.
At no point did User:MER-C seek to clarify whether I had a conflict of interest, which would have been a more polite way of addressing, they just went ahead and blocked my account. For the record I do not have no nor ever have had personal or professional connection to the company or anybody involved with the subject of the article I added. The article has been nominated again for deletion, yet at this point there has been some support for the articles retention, one editor has noted in that discussion there's no evidence that the editor is paid
. Zeddeer (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The sources offered in the draft are all announcements of routine business transactions, which per WP:ORG do not establish notability, and are a strong indicator of UPE. 331dot (talk) 10:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.