Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MoohanBOT 5

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

MoohanBOT 5

Operator: Jamesmcmahon0 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 11:49, Tuesday March 4, 2014 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual:Automatic

Programming language(s):AWB

Source code available: AWB general fixes, Plugin++ and User:Magioladitis/WikiProjects

Function overview:Go through Category:People stubs If {{WikiProject Biography}} can be added or improved do it and then perform other talk page fixes including fixes from User:Magioladitis/WikiProjects for making WikiProject templates more readable and consistent, if not, skip.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s):Periodically, after MoohanBOT Task 2

Estimated number of pages affected: varies considerably, no more than a few hundred per run often much less.

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No):Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No):Yes

Function details:There should be a zero/very low false positive as all pages in that category should be bio pages, it is unlikely that a page will be added to it by mistake. Some example edits; [1], [2] and [3]

Discussion

{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 09:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. MBisanz ^talk 20:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. The Bot has completed 50 edits with only one error on Talk:Beat the House which is not a biography article but was tagged with {{bio-stub}} by MoohanBOT Task 2. This error in turn happened because User:AvNiElNi-nA mistakenly tagged the article with {{BLP sources}}. I would like to request an extended trial for around 170 pages to finish off the rest the bot will edit in Category:People stubs mainly because most of the pages edited so far has been the creation of new talk pages rather than the edit of existing ones. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (200 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. --slakr^\ talk / 06:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. - Done 118 edits, that is everything done from Category:People stubs at the moment, if I was to carry on the trial to 200 edits it would take a long time and be very sporadic but let me know what you want me to do! Problems/observations this time;

Burnt Oranges, Florida was a mistake – This was again due to User:AvNiElNi-nA mistakenly tagging the article with {{BLP sources}}. The account has now been blocked for sockpuppetry, I've checked the contribs and fixed any other incorrect {{BLP sources}} so this should be a very rare problem in the future.
State Academic Folk Dance Ensemble Faizi Gaskarov was also a mistake, MoohanBOT Task 2 tagged it as a bio because was present, I've changed the logic of that task so this infobox won't trigger a tag in future.
Most edits were creating pages with a WP:Bio tag and auto-stub, they all seem fine and are all the same so don't see how there could be a problem.
There were no other problems to existing pages that were being edited either, it seems to handle the talk page well.

Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 12:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of a member of the Bot Approvals Group. Once assistance has been rendered, please deactivate this tag by replacing it with {{t|BAG assistance needed}}. I think the bot has done around 200 edits now, I haven't keeping exact count. Other than the issues above all seems fine, it's adding/changing the wikiproject template as expected. I think it is ready for approval. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 10:27, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. MBisanz ^talk 05:06, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.