Jump to content

Wikipedia:Everything you need to know: Revision history

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 February 2024

17 November 2023

16 November 2023

  • curprev 22:3122:31, 16 November 2023‎ StuckWithBadVersions talk contribs‎ 13,593 bytes −2,073‎ It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tag: Reverted

6 November 2023

5 November 2023

  • curprev 13:1713:17, 5 November 2023‎ DanielRigal talk contribs‎ m 15,644 bytes +2,180‎ Reverted 1 edit by 103.75.198.154 (talk) to last revision by Panian513 Tags: Twinkle Undo
  • curprev 07:5107:51, 5 November 2023‎ 103.75.198.154 talk‎ 13,464 bytes −2,180‎ It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tag: Reverted

3 November 2023

  • curprev 02:2702:27, 3 November 2023‎ Panian513 talk contribs‎ m 15,644 bytes +2,124‎ Undid revision 1183245320 by 185.189.199.77 (talk) - no consensus for major changes to a project page Tag: Undo
  • curprev 02:2502:25, 3 November 2023‎ 185.189.199.77 talk‎ 13,520 bytes −2,124‎ It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tag: Reverted

29 October 2023

  • curprev 04:4904:49, 29 October 2023‎ Yoshi24517 talk contribs‎ m 15,644 bytes +2,125‎ Reverted edits by 201.71.2.208 (talk): no consensus for edit, get consensus FIRST before edit (HG) (3.4.12) Tags: Huggle Rollback
  • curprev 04:4804:48, 29 October 2023‎ 201.71.2.208 talk‎ 13,519 bytes −2,125‎ It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tag: Reverted

28 October 2023

  • curprev 20:3120:31, 28 October 2023‎ Panian513 talk contribs‎ m 15,644 bytes +2,115‎ Undid revision 1182357226 by 201.71.2.208 (talk) - change without consensus Tag: Undo
  • curprev 20:3020:30, 28 October 2023‎ 201.71.2.208 talk‎ 13,529 bytes −2,115‎ It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 03:4003:40, 28 October 2023‎ DanielRigal talk contribs‎ 15,644 bytes +2,119‎ Undid revision 1182245701 by 201.71.2.208 (talk) Ban evasion Tag: Undo
  • curprev 02:4002:40, 28 October 2023‎ MusikBot II talk contribs‎ m 13,525 bytes −17‎ Removing protection templates from unprotected page (more info)
  • curprev 02:2102:21, 28 October 2023‎ 201.71.2.208 talk‎ 13,542 bytes −2,119‎ It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Tag: Reverted

17 June 2023

  • curprev 19:1219:12, 17 June 2023‎ DanielRigal talk contribs‎ m 15,661 bytes +2,022‎ Reverted 1 edit by ContentIsWhatMatters (talk) to last revision by Ponyo Tags: Twinkle Undo
  • curprev 18:0718:07, 17 June 2023‎ ContentIsWhatMatters talk contribs‎ 13,639 bytes −2,022‎ It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Tag: Reverted

18 April 2023

27 March 2023

22 February 2023

  • curprev 18:4218:42, 22 February 2023‎ DanielRigal talk contribs‎ m 15,568 bytes +1,382‎ Reverted 1 edit by One Ten Nine Ten (talk) to last revision by Daniel Case Tags: Twinkle Undo
  • curprev 01:5001:50, 22 February 2023‎ One Ten Nine Ten talk contribs‎ 14,186 bytes −1,382‎ It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Full sentences. OUTING section was way too long for a summary page. Please seriously consider content before reverting. Tag: Reverted

18 January 2023

17 January 2023

11 January 2023

24 December 2022

23 December 2022

12 December 2022

10 December 2022

9 December 2022

8 December 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Everything_you_need_to_know"