Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hurricane Rick (2009)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 23:34, 25 January 2010 [1].

Hurricane Rick (2009)[edit]

Nominator(s): Cyclonebiskit (talk) 07:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article candidates/Hurricane Rick (2009)/archive1

I am nominating this for featured article because I feel that it meets all FA criteria. In addition to being an amazingly powerful storm, the article is necessary in the Category 5 Pacific hurricanes featured topic. All thoughts and comments are welcome. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 07:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image review: all images are verifiably in the public domain. Jappalang (talk) 02:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: about citations, just a few polish: is "ciudadania-express" really capitalised that way? "Notimex." Italics required! "La Prensa." Italics required! Fifelfoo (talk) 11:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the three references. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Alt text done. ~~Please add alt text to the lead image (in the infobox). Thanks.~~ Eubulides (talk) 19:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There was a typo in the infobox template that prevented the alt text from displaying; I fixed that. Eubulides (talk) 20:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support on comprehensiveness. Lots of good info, nothing missing as far as I can tell. Note that I've not read the article in detail however. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support! --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 01:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Article looks good and seems to meet the FAC Criteria.Jason Rees (talk) 23:21, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support This article is awesome and deserves to be Featured. Why not make it official? Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

Note, I'm going to go off on a rant if I have to remind hurricane editors again to join Category X with an WP:NBSP :) Please fix throughout. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 22:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems to have everything a hurricane article should have. Well written and cited. --mav (Urgent FACs/FARs) 01:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.