Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hippocrates/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC) [1].
Hippocrates[edit]
- Notified: Zbxgscqf, Dwaipayanc, WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, WikiProject Greece, WikiProject Medicine, WikiProject History of Science, talk page notification 2022-02-12
Review section[edit]
I am nominating this featured article for review because of concerns related to FA criterion 1c: uncited claims, insufficiently high-quality sourcing, and lack of reference to recent high-quality reliable sources. I raised these issues on Talk:Hippocrates at the end of January; in four weeks no attempt has been made to solve any of these issues. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Notifications: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC lack of significant improvement, issues still present (t · c) buidhe 23:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, lack of sufficient engagement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, minimal engagement. Hog Farm Talk 14:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section[edit]
- Sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist issues still present (t · c) buidhe 01:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Lack of any significant improvements. --The helper5667 (talk) 18:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist: No significant improvements. I'm not an expert in this area, so I can't comment on the quality of the sources, but there are numerous sources listed on the talk page that can be considered for inclusion in the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:02, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - uses lower-quality sources instead of key higher-quality ones. No engagement, only vandalism reversion. Hog Farm Talk 14:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist what a pity, again, for WP:MED's decline. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.