Wikipedia:Featured article review/StarCraft (video game)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Phils, S@bre, Al83tito, Ferret, Judgesurreal777, Ost316, Spy-cicle, JimmyBlackwing, WP Video games, WP Science Fiction, noticed in December 2020
Review section
[edit]This 2006 promotion contains a number of sources that would no longer be accepted at FAC. From a quick glance, CreepColony, sclegacy.com, Operation CWAL, soundtrack collector, game genie, and mobygames should all almost certainly be replaced, and there are several others that I think are likely dubious but I'm not familiar with. The sequel of StarCraft II likely also warrants somewhat more discussion, and there are lesser issues such as weird italicization of "factions", and items that need checked for updating or have an as of date added, such as "The balance stays complete via infrequent patches (game updates) provided by Blizzard". Hog Farm Talk 04:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I'd add that StarCraft is one of the best-covered games ever released, and that simply isn't reflected in the article. The small size of the Development section, and the lack of an in-depth Sales section (despite an overwhelming amount of global sales information), is proof enough. This was adequate for 2006, but it's not comprehensive enough for today. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC; only edits have been to add details to the plot information. Hog Farm Talk 17:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, not comprehensive. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no/minimal improvement (t · c) buidhe 00:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - nothing occurring to address sourcing issues. Hog Farm Talk 14:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist needed improvements not happening. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.