Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of honors received by Maya Angelou/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 10:01, 24 March 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of honors received by Maya Angelou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it failed its first nomination due to lack of support, and I believe it's to the point that it can pass. This also happens to the last stage in the creation of a Maya Angelou FT. Her 85th birthday is April 4, so I'd like it to happen by then. Thanks for your consideration. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support the first nomination was archived too early. Probably worth asking people to review that page. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 14:59, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. In the notes column, descriptions should not end in period, unless they are complete sentences. Also why National Book Award nomination is not mentioned in the table? Ruslik_Zero 18:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed periods. I wasn't able to find a source that states the year of the nomination, so I removed it from the lead. (Lots of sources state that it happened, though, so it belongs in other articles that don't require a year.) Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Astros4477 |
---|
Comments –
-- Astros4477 (Talk) 19:32, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support-- Astros4477 (Talk) 22:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support An excellent piece of work. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, my comments were addressed, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Quick comment – Ref 17 has an excess quote mark after the publisher (New York Times) that needs removal.Giants2008 (Talk) 00:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Got it, thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 12:29, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Gamaliel (talk) 04:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments much improved from the initial nomination, good work.
The Rambling Man (talk) 16:56, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for the kind words, useful feedback, and catches of stupid errors. ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.