Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Fish/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Strong consensus to delist. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
GAR from 2007, reassesed in 2008. Very important article in a poor state - almost half of the text in unsourced, f.e. half of Etymology, whole Evolution, half of Taxonomy, parts of Diversity, Anatomy and physiology, Muscular system, half of Reproductive system, etc.
Other problems - underdeveloped sections - f.e. Scales, Emotion, and Fishkeeping.
Tags present: dubious – discuss. Article is probably outdated: Conservation section starts with The 2006 IUCN Red List names 1,173 fish species that are threatened with extinction
- it's 17 years ago!
I don't usually edit biology articles, so will ping some users who are good in it (hope it's ok, no pressure of course, but would be great to know your opinion): @LittleJerry:, @Chiswick Chap:, @Casliber:
Artem.G (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist Damn this article is bad. I'm going to preemptively put a delist. Though, if major work on this article begins then consider this vote null until the major work is done. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist per nom, unless serious effort is made to fix the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist choppy paras, unsourced text etc. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist, extensive work needed exceeding the reasonable scope of GAR. CMD (talk) 07:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)