Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 23

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep delldot ∇. 00:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC) This template should be deleted because several articles included in the template are not those of U.S. State Senate Majority Leaders, and the template is essentially a duplicate of Template:U.S. State Treasurers. --TommyBoy (talk) 04:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I admit it is a duplicate, but at the same time it's a work in progress so please I can't always get around to everything--Jack Cox (talk) 16:31, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Please Jack Cox add db-author in the template since you agree it's a duplicate. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Keep. It's not a duplicate anymore. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: I've fixed up the list and it's no longer a duplicate so I'd like to ask TommyBoy if he could please drop the TFD request?--Jack Cox (talk) 00:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, now that the redundancy issue has been solved, I no longer support deletion of the template. --TommyBoy (talk) 01:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted upon request of author. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Patar knight/Template Sandbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Puts whatever page this template is on on a list for Category:Unassessed Military History articles ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 17:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this looks like an old work-in-progress (a template intended for the defunct WP:Fencing, based on the {{WPMILHIST}} one) which now turns up in Category:Unassessed military history articles as a result of recent changes to {{WPMILHIST}}. --ROGER DAVIES talk 18:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 00:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Gunfighter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only six instances. Redundant to {{Infobox Person}} or {{Infobox Criminal}}. The "notable opponents" parameter can be [has been] added to the former. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 17:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: All instances now replaced. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 19:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Meth lab (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Provocative userbox of extremely narrow scope, used to indicate that a user is adept in performing what is in most places an illegal activity. Only used on the user page of its creator, and does not appear to have been created to aid in collaboration or anything constructive. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep delldot ∇. 00:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Maharashtra Barnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The text uses other languages than English, which I think, is not acceptable. Shyam (T/C) 08:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.