Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

February 8[edit]


Template:Law enforcement agencies in US county[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:Law enforcement agencies in US county (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)

Unused. NSH002 (talk) 07:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 04:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Delete per nominator....William 14:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 02:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SCP Foundation[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:SCP Foundation (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)

All linked articles have been deleted and salted. Auric talk 19:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - All red links; it isn't functional as a navigation bar at this time. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 02:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

  • I think this can be deleted —PC-XT+ 06:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is why restricting WP:T3 was a bad idea. Keφr 11:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Plaek Phibunsongkhram[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:Plaek Phibunsongkhram (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)

Phibun is indeed an important historical figure in 20th-century Thailand, and a navigation template for him would be warranted IF there were separate articles covering his life, various political roles and premiership. However, there is currently no article for Premiership of Plaek Phibunsongkhram or the like, and as such a navbox is not warranted. Most entries included here are only tangentially related to him, and not at all to each other. This is in violation of WP:NAVBOX, which suggests:

  1. All articles within a template relate to a single, coherent subject.
  2. The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article.
  3. The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent.
  4. There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template.
  5. You would want to list many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles. Paul_012 (talk) 07:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 03:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete per nominator's arguments. --RJFF (talk) 21:58, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 02:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.