Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 15

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 00:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A navigation template that navigates to only one article. The event it covers has been deleted at AfD twice. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G7North America1000 17:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant. All links in body of navbox point to the same article. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy to User:Anna Frodesiak/Red sandboxPrimefac (talk) 05:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Not a coherent group. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. BethNaught (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two of the links, The Star and Lamp and The Ability Experience, are now self-redirects to Pi Kappa Phi. Once those are removed only two list articles remain, which seems superfluous for a navbox. Grayfell (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge the Republican template into the general Election template. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 05:34, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:2012 Republican primaries with Template:2012 U.S. presidential election state results.
Most of the articles referenced in Template:2012 Republican primaries have been merged into the articles referenced in Template:2012 U.S. presidential election state results. Only the territory articles have not been merged. (The DC article was merged.) Fbdave (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).