Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 February 28
February 28
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:12, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft up for G13. Is this useful? Legacypac (talk) 22:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete It is rather confused ("Chamaeleonidae families by genus"????) and incomplete (only includes 3 of 12 Chamaeleonidae genera). I'm not a fan of navboxes for species in genus/family. They require an extra layer of maintenance as new species are described, or species are shuffled off into different genera, and this maintenance usually doesn't happen. Plantdrew (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. An unwatched shadow space of templates is a very bad idea. Templates in development can be developed in template space, or user space. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 May 9. Primefac (talk) 11:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. Requested by author. --woodensuperman 10:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessary navbox for a music act with an article for just one album. Doesn't aid navigation. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- The template developes over time with the main article growing. Do we really have to delete it?--◂ épine talk♬ 02:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The navbox currently has little if any use. It cannot be said what will happen to the band in the future. WP:NOTCRYSTAL.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagleash (talk • contribs)
- Delete. Nothing to navigate. --woodensuperman 10:21, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- I agree then, let's delete it.--◂ épine talk♬ 09:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).