Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 January 28

< January 27	January 29 >

January 28

Template:Probability vs odds.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Probability vs odds.svg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template whose image is already transcluded outside of template space on two pages. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please subst and delete. cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 03:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is there to subst? This is not a single-use template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tissot indicatrix world map cyl equal-area proj comparison.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tissot indicatrix world map cyl equal-area proj comparison.svg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please subst and delete. cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 03:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roll pitch yaw mnemonic.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Roll pitch yaw mnemonic.svg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template transcluding a file already used on multiple articles. No need for it to be this way. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please subst and delete. cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 03:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:VictorianRailways-Diagrams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:VictorianRailways-Diagrams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose now in use. --ThylacineHunter (talk) 06:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:San Gabriel Subdivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San_Gabriel_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S2B (Bologna metropolitan railway service)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S2B (Bologna metropolitan railway service) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now added in Portomaggiore railway station (an article I should have written long ago, since I'm trying to cover all railway hubs in my region with Wikipedia articles). Fabio Bettani (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Fabio Bettani. Useddenim (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Railways in Llanberis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railways in Llanberis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:43, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Linked to from 36 articles. Useddenim (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's linked by Template:Carnarvonshire Railway. This should find at least one article to be used on. Otherwise what is the point of creating a railway template if it's not going to be used on an article about railways? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the fact that you seem unclear about the concept of {{Transclusionless}} templates, it's also used directly in Llanberis railway station (London and North Western Railway), Llanberis railway station (Llanberis Lake Railway), and Llanberis railway station (Snowdon Mountain Railway). Useddenim (talk) 22:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You added that in the articles you're referring to today. All you could have said was it has been added to the relevant spaces. Now it has been, this can be kept. If you started with that, this discussion would have ended sooner. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kingdom Chromista and its eight phyla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kingdom Chromista and its eight phyla (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused reference template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kerman Province Map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kerman Province Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused map. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kangra Valley Railway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kangra Valley Railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as a detailed route map exists on the mainspace. Not needed. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Route map moved from mainspace back into the template where it belongs. Useddenim (talk) 18:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Haifa suburban railway map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Haifa suburban railway map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused with no articles for use. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gdańsk–Stargard Railway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gdańsk–Stargard Railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused with no articles for use. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Five kingdom system

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Five kingdom system (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that is really article material. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CrossCountry Birmingham–Stansted Airport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CrossCountry Birmingham–Stansted Airport (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CrossCountry Nottingham–Cardiff Central (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CrossCountry Reading–North East England (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CrossCountry South Coast–Manchester (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CrossCountry South East England–Manchester/North East England/Scotland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beersheba suburban railway map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 4. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Beersheba_suburban_railway_map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Trans-Manchurian Railway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trans-Manchurian Railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Route map already featured on Chinese Eastern Railway. This isn't needed. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Template restored to article. (It had been subst'd by an editor that made a whole string of reverted questionable edit.) Useddenim (talk) 18:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Trans-Mongolian Railway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trans-Mongolian Railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and Unneeded as Trans-Mongolian Railway has the route map within the infobox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Template restored to article. Useddenim (talk) 20:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Ferry RDT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 4. Izno (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South_Ferry_RDT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Royal National Park railway line RDT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal National Park railway line RDT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused with no articles for use. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Now transcluded into an appropriate article. Useddenim (talk) 21:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:River Clady RDT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:River Clady RDT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused with no article linked to stations where a railway template would be used and created for. All this is rivers and bridges. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template is for rivers, not railways. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: used in parent article. Useddenim (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: used in parent article. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Railways in Pančevo RDT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railways in Pančevo RDT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused with no articles for use. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Added to Pančevo (pending translation of Pančevo railway station articles from Serbian). Useddenim (talk) 21:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Altamont Branch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 4. Izno (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Altamont_Branch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-par/np-cnst1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-par/np-cnst1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/DB-IC left/95

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/DB-IC left/95 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/DB-IC right/95 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-BY left/67 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-BY left/86 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-BY right/67 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:S-line/RB-BY right/86 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All unused and outdated S-line templates. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Richmond station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Richmond station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as more detailed route information exists on the article within the infobox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This template presents the information in a different format (visual diagram) which can help with reader comprehension. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not unused; transcluded into parent article. Useddenim (talk) 21:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:QING-1862

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QING-1862 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Providence station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Providence station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Detailed route map exists on the article. This is not needed. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Template was accidentally removed from article. Useddenim (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oakland Coliseum Station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oakland Coliseum Station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Detailed route information exists on the article this was created for. Unneeded. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This template presents the information in a different format (visual diagram) which can help with reader comprehension. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Added to parent article. Useddenim (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Millbrae station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Millbrae station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unneeded as Millbrae station has detailed information for planned, former, and current routes within the infobox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This template presents the information in a different format (visual diagram) which can help with reader comprehension. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Transcluded into parent article. Useddenim (talk) 22:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Merced rail stations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Merced rail stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused with no articles for use. All links are train/railway stations rather than a route which is what these templates are usually for rather than listing stations. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Not sure what this diagram was trying to show. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zemun railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zemun railway station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and not needed as the Zemun railway station article has the route map as part of the infobox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Reverted template deletion. It is a well-established convention that Route Diagram Templates should be transcluded rather than coded directly into articles. Useddenim (talk) 22:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).