Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 June 7
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < June 6 | << May | June | Jul >> | June 8 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
June 7
[edit]04:24:05, 7 June 2014 review of submission by 208.101.167.65
[edit]- 208.101.167.65 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
208.101.167.65 (talk) 04:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC) MALIFICA
- I'm sorry, this post is the only edit for your IP and you've not told us where your draft is, so we have no way of helping you. Can you tell us where your draft is? Do you just have a general question about editing that isn't related to a specific new page you are trying to create? If so, the regular help desk may have an answer for you or the Teahouse which is a little easier going friendly place for general questions about editing Wikipedia. Good luck! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 13:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
06:52:55, 7 June 2014 review of submission by Sucheta Raikar
[edit]
I am not sure how to proceed further. I have have provided genuine references but yet I am asked to provide more. Do I shift the external sources to the references to make the article more credible.
Sucheta Raikar (talk) 06:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. Kind of. IMDB is not a reliable source. Times of India is very much a reliable source, even in their "blogs" section, when they have a title that explicitly talks about the person. Try reading WP:REFB again. But to me it seems likely that the person is notable, and that just the layout and perhaps some extra sources needs more work. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 08:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- to extend this good advice a little, the need is to show that his work has been noticed as notable directing on notable films. It's not enough that the films be notable--his directing must be specifically discussed by the sources also. It should be possible to show this if you use the material--and use it not just in general referencesi n the endf, but as references to specific points in the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
16:01:01, 7 June 2014 review of submission by Embar1
[edit]Would like to include Bio of Pete Uebelacker that is linked from American Motorcycle Hall of Fame Inductees. Most of the other inductees have bios included. Embar1 (talk) 16:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Embar1, the issue is that you've provided no WP:Sourcing whatsoever, so a reader has no idea where to verify these facts. While you can probably use the AMHF site to cite a fact or two (do not simply copy-paste their bio, that would be a copyright violation), we still need a wider body of coverage. Can you find verification of facts about him and his career in motorcycle magazines, books of racing history, etc? If so, please footnote them in. See WP:Referencing for beginners. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- These all look like they could be used as sources: — Brianhe (talk) 00:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Embar1, the issue is that you've provided no WP:Sourcing whatsoever, so a reader has no idea where to verify these facts. While you can probably use the AMHF site to cite a fact or two (do not simply copy-paste their bio, that would be a copyright violation), we still need a wider body of coverage. Can you find verification of facts about him and his career in motorcycle magazines, books of racing history, etc? If so, please footnote them in. See WP:Referencing for beginners. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Looking Back: Posts best time of day late in race; Class B title taken by Sutter, Muskegon Chronicle
- Motorcycle Hall of Fame
- Motorcycle Illustrated, 1921
18:34:34, 7 June 2014 review of submission by Ecubee
[edit]Ecubee (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Ecubee: Your submission has only one independent, reliable source. Further, your subject fails WP:MUSICBIO, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:GNG. Please read all those guidelines before proceeding. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
18:52:51, 7 June 2014 review of submission by Svarshavsky
[edit]- Svarshavsky (talk · contribs)
I am confused regarding why my article has been rejected on June 7. There is a comment that because of the lack of independent sources (probablu this is from May 28 and it has been resolved), and another one that because of incorrect use of citation. Which one is actual and what would you recommend me to do? Thank you. Sergei Svarshavsky (talk) 18:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Svarshavsky: The latest comments are the ones you should be most concerned about. Too many of your sources are from the subject himself, therefore not independent. Please read WP:RS and WP:42. On another point, I recommend removing all Russian words from the text of the article as it's both unnecessary and confusing. The sources can remain in Russian but I'm not so certain we need Cyrillic translations of so much Latin text. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Review of Draft:Jaroslav Balcar
[edit]
Accepted move to Jaroslav Balcar as a Olympic ski jumper article 86.15.162.137 (86.15.162.137|talk), 19:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Accepted i'm sorry i put his older brother dead is wrong i did not ment to and made a mistake. Please move this article into space to Jaroslav Balcar, Jodi. a. schneider 86.15.162.137 (talk), 19:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Please stop using the {{accepted}} template, if you have not actually accepted something (which you are technically unable to do as an IP editor). It is confusing for others. I have moved the article to mainspace. Bellerophon talk to me 09:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
23:45:16, 7 June 2014 review of submission by FeatherPluma
[edit]- FeatherPluma (talk · contribs)
Dudes, what gives with advancing Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The ACE Study to mainspace? I've tweaked this AfC submission and I judge it good for advancement to mainspace. However, the advancement template isn't working for me for this draft. Can you help, please? Oh, and the article should be renamed to "Adverse Childhood Experiences (study)", right, and should be affiliated to the Medicine and Psychology wikiprojects. Please put some wind behind the sails on this one. Ta muchly. FeatherPluma (talk) 23:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
FeatherPluma (talk) 23:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is a first time I've seen this...
 | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The ACE Study is fully move protected and an administrator is needed to accept and move the page to article space if they see fit. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 00:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have unprotected the draft. It was moved to an inappropriate place by the original author, and when that move was reverted, the draft was protected to prevent a repetition. Accepted by FeatherPluma. Huon (talk) 01:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. FeatherPluma (talk) 01:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)