Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 November 24
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 23 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 25 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 24
[edit]08:00:01, 24 November 2018 review of submission by Shahabhishek1991
[edit]
Shahabhishek1991 08:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Shahabhishek1991 - It is not useful to post your question about your draft twice. Aside from the lack of notability, for which your draft was rejected, your draft has multiple grammatical errors, and would have needed copy-editing in article space. Please discuss your concerns with the rejecting reviewer. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:55, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
A text about a notable person remains in Draft space. Please do something. Xx236 (talk) 09:20, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- No one has requested it be reviewed. I'll accept it. Legacypac (talk) 16:02, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Liberationwiki (talk) 12:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- The draft was deleted as advertising. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:50, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
13:23:25, 24 November 2018 review of draft by Jovanmilic97
[edit]- Jovanmilic97 (talk · contribs)
I have no idea what to do with this one. After cleaning up the draft as a AfC reviewer (this draft was not created by me), I came here. Are references #1 and #2 enough in coverage to pass this draft as a stub per bare WP:GNG? Everything else in the draft itself is a pure primary use.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:23, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jovanmilic97: You may find Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide helpful. Any good research university library should have a subscription to Journal Citation Reports, where you would find the impact factor. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
13:31:38, 24 November 2018 review of submission by Ondrejjanicko
[edit]
Pasted draft
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Consecutive numbers in reverse Fibonacci sequence aproximate to number j = 6,828427112475… wich is reverse Fibonaccio ratio. Exact calculation of reverse Fibonaccio ratio is j = 4 + sqrt(8) = 6,828427112475… The reverse Fibonacci sequence is derived from 24 repeated line of the sum of the digits of the classic Fibonacci sequence. The situation show folowing table.
}} |
Hi, I do not understand why you need reference for posting my draft? If you can do aritmetic you can verifi my draft by yourself. You do not need reference to anybody to verify validity of my draft. Just use aritmetic. It is easy. It is simple. It is clear. Ondrejjanicko (talk) 13:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Look at this for example Fibonacci number. Posting references and reliable sources is needed so that you separate your article from an original research, which Wikipedia is not. Read WP:NOR. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- User:Ondrejjanicko - Read the policy on original research. Some editors want to use Wikipedia to publish new ideas that might or might not be true. Wikipedia isn't for new ideas, but for ideas that have at least been discussed by reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2018 (UTC)