Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 May 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< May 9 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 10

[edit]

01:38, 10 May 2023 review of submission by Badabingbadaboong

[edit]

What I need help is finding examples of a primary or independent, reliable, secondary source of information. The user Drimes really didnt go in depth on what an example of those sources are, he just shot down my draft. Could someone please go further in depth on the problems with my website, considering that there's literal proof that DC Comics announced that this is a crossover event? Badabingbadaboong (talk) 01:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Badabingbadaboong, Drmies was clear in his assessment. Reliable sources are required. These need to have high quality editorial control and an established track record of accuracy and error correction. The sources need to be independent. That means that the coverage does not recapitulate press releases and is completely uninfluenced by any marketing, public relations or advertising activity by DC Comics. The coverage must be significant. It must devote a significant amount of detail to the topic. Brief, passing mentions are inadequate. So, which of your references meet that stringent three part standard? Cullen328 (talk) 07:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

05:23, 10 May 2023 review of submission by Bhubaneswar2009

[edit]

can we use school website as a reference for staff details and student enrollment details in school articles? Bhubaneswar2009 (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is needed are references to published reliable sources that are independent of this school that devote significant coverage to the school. Once notability has been indisputably established, then you can use the school's website for uncontroversial details, but that does nothing to establish or bolster notability. Cullen328 (talk) 07:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

06:21, 10 May 2023 review of submission by עומר תשבי

[edit]

Hello, could you please tell me why this article was removed? What do you find in the text, that you believe that feels like an advertisement? Most importantly, how can I improve it? עומר תשבי (talk) 06:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, עומר תשב. This passage is among many that are overtly promotional: In his Hebrew University lab, Reifen studied and developed a process to extract an almost-pure protein powder from chickpeas. According to Ram, chickpeas have “several unique attributes that make it a particularly successful source for meat, fish and dairy-product substitutes”.Reifen states that “As opposed to protein produced from other legumes, the chickpea isolate has a neutral flavor. What’s more, it is clear, has no aroma and can be processed into a wide variety of textures”. As opposed to Soy Protein, Reifen states that “Soy contains feminine sex hormones – phytoestrogens – in immense quantities… Another drawback…, is that soy causes allergies. Another major problem is that soybeans only grow in certain parts of the world because they require specific climatic conditions”. That simply regurgitates the promotional claims of people closely associated with the company. An acceptable Wikipedia article primarily summarizes what reliable sources entirely independent of the company say about the company. We should never include any evaluative praise referenced to company people. Otherwise, Wikipedia articles about companies would always say, "We build the best widgets!!" That is the function of the company's website, not of a neutrally written encyclopedia article about the company. Cullen328 (talk) 06:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

07:09, 10 May 2023 review of submission by BioTechDon1

[edit]

Checking how to re-submit for approval. Received a decline in February and (hopefully!) rectified the article to reflect the reviewer's comments but worried this is being treated as permanently declined. Is there a way to re-submit? BioTechDon1 (talk) 07:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BioTechDon1: you have resubmitted the draft; it is awaiting a new review. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah - amazing! Thank you! BioTechDon1 (talk) 07:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Accepted.Naraht (talk) 07:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

07:56, 10 May 2023 review of submission by Rhichsi

[edit]

just want to write article for a bio graphy Rhichsi (talk) 07:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhichsi: this draft has been rejected as non-notable, and is pending deletion. Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not LinkedIn or other social media for posting personal profiles. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08:10, 10 May 2023 review of submission by Rhichsi

[edit]

Dear Wikipedia Editors,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request your kind assistance in publishing an article about Muhammad Umar Mumtaz on Wikipedia. Despite my best efforts, my previous attempts were rejected, and I believe with your guidance and expertise, we can successfully create a comprehensive and well-sourced article.

Muhammad Umar Mumtaz is a notable web developer and social media marketer based in Pakistan. His contributions in the field of web development and social media marketing have garnered significant attention and recognition. I strongly believe that an article on his professional achievements and contributions would be a valuable addition to Wikipedia's content.

To address the concerns raised in the previous rejection, I have taken the following steps to improve the article:

Notability: I have gathered additional reliable sources that establish Muhammad Umar Mumtaz's significance in the field. These sources include reputable publications, news outlets, and industry-specific websites, all of which provide comprehensive coverage of his work.

Sources: I have diligently compiled a list of reliable sources that support the information presented in the article. These sources include interviews, articles, and reports from credible sources known for their journalistic integrity and accuracy.

Neutral Tone: I have revised the article to ensure a neutral and unbiased tone throughout. The content now focuses on presenting factual information supported by reliable sources, avoiding any promotional or subjective language.

Structure: The article has been reorganized into distinct sections, such as Early Life, Career, and Personal Life, each providing well-developed and relevant information about Muhammad Umar Mumtaz's background, professional journey, and personal achievements.

Clear and Concise Writing: The revised article uses clear and concise language, making it accessible to a general audience. Technical terms and jargon have been appropriately explained or replaced with layman's terms where necessary.

I kindly request your guidance and support in reviewing the revised article and providing feedback on any further improvements or adjustments required to meet Wikipedia's guidelines and standards. I am eager to work collaboratively with the Wikipedia community to ensure the article meets the highest standards of reliability, verifiability, and neutrality.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response and the opportunity to contribute a well-crafted and informative article about Muhammad Umar Mumtaz to Wikipedia. 

Rhichsi (talk) 08:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly refer to my previous reply (and please don't start multiple threads on the same issue). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:45, 10 May 2023 review of submission by 167.102.157.170

[edit]

I know the citations for Parker Select , The Takeover, and Boss Battle Bonanza are youtube videos, but they're actual episodes of the episodes listed above. Is there any way I can still cite said episodes without linking the youtube videos? 

167.102.157.170 (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16:53, 10 May 2023 review of submission by ThumpLocal

[edit]

I am asking for assistance as this is a historic business in a historic location with references including this recent article published by the Englewood Colorado Historic Preservation Society. You can see the article when scrolling down to the second page here http://www.historicenglewood.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Englewood-Newsletter-March-2023.pdf

Please help us as we have been trying for quite some time to get this article published.

Thank you in advance. ThumpLocal (talk) 16:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly you need to properly declare your conflict of interest on your user page, the article has been created under a number of different titles now all deleted, this version has been declined and rejected, the topic isn't notable please WP:DROPTHESTICK. Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It’s been declined twice then rejected. I second the rejection. Not notable. I don’t intend to be harsh, but it’s time to give up on this. It will never be accepted. Thank you. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 21:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_May_10&oldid=1155228594"