Wikipedia:WikiProject Munich/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject Munich! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Munich-related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Germany|Munich=yes}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Munich articles by quality and Category:Munich articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the WikiProject Munich is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Germany}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Germany|class=???|Munich=yes}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Munich articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Munich articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Munich articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Munich articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Munich articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Munich articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Munich articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Munich articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Munich articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class Munich articles) Wikipedia Book Book 
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Munich articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Munich articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
File (for files; adds pages to Category:File-Class Munich articles)  File 
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Munich articles) Redirect page Redirect 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Munich articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Munich articles)  Project 
Template (for templates; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Munich articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Munich articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Munich articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Munich articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the MunichImp parameter in the {{WikiProject Germany}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Germany|Munich=yes| ... | MunichImp=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top Core topics about Munich. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Munich article, vital for the understanding of Munich or extremely notable to people outside of Munich. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two people from Munich in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance
High Topics that are very notable within Munich, and not unheard of outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Germany without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally
Low Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


Assessment log[edit]

Munich articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

June 9, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Simpl (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

May 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Andi Herzog (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

May 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 4, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 1, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 25, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 15, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 14, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 12, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 9, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 3, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 23, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 21, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 18, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 7, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 14, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 4, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 13, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 8, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 6, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 15, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 15, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 21, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 29, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 21, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 20, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 17, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 13, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 5, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 23, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 17, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 12, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 7, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 5, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 4, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 3, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 31, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 30, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Toni Kroos (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

July 28, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 23, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 22, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 20, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 15, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 11, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 1, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • José Sosa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

June 29, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 16, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 8, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 4, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 17, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 6, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 29, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 27, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Mike Ott (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

April 26, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Kojo Baffoe (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

April 25, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 22, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 21, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Manuel Ott (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Michael Wesely (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Mike Ott (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

April 17, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 16, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • New Town Hall (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

April 15, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 10, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 5, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 4, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 3, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 2, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 28, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 16, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 5, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 3, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 15, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 6, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 1, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 22, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 16, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Aline Sokar (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

January 14, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 12, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 10, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 9, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 7, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Aline Sokar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

January 5, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]