Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/June

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposals, June 2010

Category:Pterophoridae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Pterophoridae-stub}}: Cat scan indicates 76 articles for moth family Pterophoridae can be pulled from Category:moth stubs. Dawynn (talk) 11:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Coleophoridae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Coleophoridae-stub}}: Cat scan suggests 149 articles for moth family Coleophoridae, to be pulled out of oversized stub Category:moth stubs. Dawynn (talk) 11:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Erebidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
{{Erebidae-stub}}: Family erebidae is a fairly recently defined moth family, taking some of the subfamilies that used to be classified as noctuidae. This would already be a parent category to existing stub categories (like Category:catocalinae stubs, and Category:herminiinae stubs), along with housing other articles that fit in this family. This new category will help pull articles away from two oversized categories: Category:moth stubs and Category:noctuidae stubs. Dawynn (talk) 11:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)


Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Found out that the Lepidoptera project is using the LepIndex as its primary resource -- a resource which does not recognize family Erebidae. At this time, I will not be building this template / category. Dawynn (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:Noctuidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This is in desperate need of splitting. I'm gradually working on sorting both this stub category and the main category (Category:Noctuidae). Both have over 4000 articles.

For now, splitting these by subfamilies:

Dawynn (talk) 11:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:Wasp stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Able to pull a couple categories out of here:

Dawynn (talk) 13:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: Changed to Category:Vespidae stubs. Dawynn (talk) 08:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:Estonia geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
These are in need of a good paring down, I think; right now the category contains 805 stubs. I think perhaps a breakdown by county might be in order? Thus the following:

Categories to follow as they become viable; Harju should be already, I think. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Support as per proposal. Waacstats (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Please create. Somebody create the templates so I use for stub creation now?Starzynka (talk) 16:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Sawfly-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Main category: Category:Sawflies. Main article: Sawfly. Only 42 articles in the main category, so this will be an upmerge template for Category:Hymenoptera stubs. Dawynn (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Eulophidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New template: {{Eulophidae-stub}}. Cat scan indicates that over 300 articles can be pulled from Category:Hymenoptera stubs. Dawynn (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Czech film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The template {{Czech-film-stub}} already exists, is currently transcluded on 68 articles and I think a category should be speedily created according to S1. Svick (talk) 23:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Support speedy. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:North Dakota protected area stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Will pick up the articles under existing template {{NorthDakota-protected-area-stub}}. 66 articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:United States protected area stubs breakdown -- category requests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Official request for the following categories:

Dawynn (talk) 11:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

{{Luxembourg-writer-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Surprised we didn't have one of these already - at the very least, a stub tag would be useful. Category may follow, but not for a bit. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I thought these were already approved. It should be fine though as an S2 speedy, same with all other European countries that don't have a tag made. Just leave it upmerged until it gets large enough for a category. Borgarde (talk) 07:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Support Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:United States protected area stubs breakdown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Looking for a speedy approval on these. Not sure how many will be able to become categories, but the national group is oversized. Looking to break this down by state. {{Montana-protected-area-stub}} and {{Florida-protected-area-stub}} already exist, with their own categories. {{Minnesota-protected-area-stub}} and {{Kansas-protected-area-stub}} also already exist. Asking for templates for the remaining 50 states:

In a similar vein to what has been done with Category:United States geography stubs, I'd like the following general area categories:

These would all be categories without their own distinct templates. The appropriate individual state stubs would upmerge here, until categories could be built. Much of the format would follow what has been done with the similar geography stubs.

The state templates would then be double-upmerged to the general area categories, as well as the appropriate state geography category (see Category:United States geography stubs). References to the individual state templates would be placed on the national protected area category, much like has been done with the geography stubs. Dawynn (talk) 13:08, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

One change. Based on other categories, looks like the Georgia template should be {{GeorgiaUS-protected-area-stub}}, in order to differentiate it from the country. Dawynn (talk) 01:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hymenoptera stubs breakdown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Looking to break down the large Hymenoptera group.

Dawynn (talk) 11:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Seems like a good idea. Waacstats (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Biology organization stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating Category:Biology organization stubs/{{biology-org-stub}} - scan suggests 106 articles. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Support, seems like a good choice. Waacstats (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Ohio politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This isn't oversized as yet, but it's growing - 600+ stubs as of last count. Most of them are state-level politicians. I know something was done with Category:Pennsylvania politician stubs not too long ago; perhaps it's time to consider doing something similar here? --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Support speedily. Let me know if you need sorting help. 209.6.134.38 (talk) 21:16, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Eidos Interactive stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New category request for template {{Eidos-stub}}. I started loading with *anything* to do with Eidos Interactive, so this is not just restricted to their games. However, since there is no main category for Eidos, I will probably assign this to the Category:Eidos Interactive games. Requesting approval for speedy creation, as there are now more than 60 articles under this template. Dawynn (talk) 18:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Support. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:33, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Spanish church stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Split from European church stubs.Starzynka (talk) 09:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

134 articles linking to {{Spain-church-stub}} = Easy support Waacstats (talk) 12:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Support, naturalmente. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 13:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Support 209.6.134.38 (talk) 21:16, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/June&oldid=1077605732"