Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Operation Majestic Titan

 Main page Main talk Showcase Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Phase V Portal 

Summary of Military history WikiProject open tasks watch · edit · full list News and announcements The April newsletter is now available. Editors are advised that Featured Articles promoted before 2016 are in need of review, if you had an article promoted to Featured status on or before 2016 please check and update your article before they are listed at FAR/C. Current discussions No major discussions are open at the moment Featured article candidates Turabay dynasty • John Bullock Clark • Thomas Neville (died 1460) • Battle of Poison Spring Featured article review USS Wisconsin (BB-64) • Edward III of England • Byzantine Empire • Battle of Red Cliffs • Edward I of England Featured picture candidates Thorsten Nordenfelt A-Class review Battle of Plum Point Bend • Henry Biard • Johann Mickl • Battle of Saipan • Fort Corcoran • T-26 • Sihanouk Trail • Battle of La Haye-du-Puits • Battle of Tinian • Henry Macandrew • Boot Monument Peer reviews Central America under Mexican rule • Muckrach Castle • Battle of Pandu • West Point, New York • William, Prince of Wales • Charles the Bold Good article nominees Stephen Badlam • Reza Qoli Mirza Afshar • Nazran uprising • Abu'l-Fath Khan Javanshir • Battle of Ekiokpagha • Iga ikki • Kōka ikki • Ava–Hanthawaddy War (1401–1403) • William Henry Harrison Seeley • Aérospatiale SA 330 Puma • Khalji Revolution • Travis King • 1864 Washington Arsenal explosion • Antoine Hamilton • George II of Greece • Roswell incident • Podgorica Assembly • Adolf von Rhemen • Masopha • Sam Bahadur (film) • Maximiliano Hernández Martínez • Mohammad Shah Qajar • HMS Renard (1909) • Battle of Meligalas • Blohm & Voss BV 40 • Japanese destroyer Take (1944) • Zeppelin-Staaken L • Gubir shootdown Good article reassessments Crusading movement Articles that need... work on referencing and citation (147,100) • only work on referencing and citation (43,150) • work on coverage and accuracy (122,191) • only work on coverage and accuracy (19,581) • work on structure (31,766) • only work on structure (361) • work on grammar (8,187) • only work on grammar (48) • work on supporting materials (32,682) • only work on supporting materials (1,333) • assessment (2) • assessment as lists (116) • project tags fixed (9) • assessment checklists added (11) • assessment checklists completed (27) • task forces added (320) • attention to task force coverage (680)

Articles in need of reviewers

Here's our current list of outstanding reviews in need of attention:

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/French battleship Justice
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/French battleship Charlemagne

These GANs need a reviewer:

Related, but non-BB articles for review

FACs, FLCs, and ACRs:

GANs:

After what feels like an eternity... Parsecboy (talk) 13:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

You can say that again... Parsecboy (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Again.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Italian battleship Francesco Caracciolo

I've just noticed that User:DeltaSquad833 has created an article for the launched just to clear the slipway Italian battleship Francesco Caracciolo (1920). Looks to be adapted straight from the class article, though I haven't checked to see how direct a copy the language is. I see no need for this article as it offers no extra details over the class article, unlike our articles on the US battleships Kentucky and Illinois. It's also in pretty bad shape, but maybe that's just me. Thoughts?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Maybe just leave it on for now until we get enough feedback? Probably just move it to draft and see what I’ll do with it.--DeltaSquad833 (talk) 12:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Honestly, I'm not sure that the article is necessary or even useful as the class article already covers everything we know about the ship. And I don't believe that this is one of those situations where there's more information available to be discovered. But let's see what others think about it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

I don't generally think there's a point to articles on ships that weren't built, unless there's something significant in the available sources to justify it. For example, Japanese battleship Tosa was involved in weapons tests that were used to help develop the armor layout for Yamato. Parsecboy (talk) 14:20, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

@DeltaSquad833:, since it's been a few months and nothing further has come of it, I've moved the article to User:DeltaSquad833/Italian battleship Francesco Caracciolo (1920). Parsecboy (talk) 21:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Discussion that may be of interest

There's a discussion about the contents of List of battleships here that editors here may be interested in joining. Parsecboy (talk) 14:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Kirov-class

Would the (Kirov class battlecruisers) be in the scope of the project? SEKDIS (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Coordinator discussion

FYI: WT:MHCOORD#Majestic Titan. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 17:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)