Wikipedia talk:WikiGryphon
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiGryphon page. |
|
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top Icon
[edit]I've created a page top icon for WikiGryphons in my sandbox. Can I move it to the mainspace and add a link to it here? Dogposter 17:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Sure, go right ahead. <3--Twilight Helryx (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Am I the only one?
[edit]I understand that the article has over time gotten overly detailed (due to my own foolishness) and thus it closes a lot of people out. As such, I have cut away all the excess and confusing parts and left the bare necessities in. However, should there be no other WikiGryphons found, I may request that this page be deleted. So if there are any WikiGryphons out there, please post here to convince me not to. Even one other can make a big difference.--Twilight Helryx (talk) 23:04, 26 October 2009
- I think I might be one. Dogposter 01:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- That's great. Please feel free to edit this page to help make it clearer. =3 --Twilight Helryx (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure Meaghan is one. *Pepperpiggle**Sign!* 01:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- That's great. Please feel free to edit this page to help make it clearer. =3 --Twilight Helryx (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think I might be one. Dogposter 01:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Heheh, yeah, I've noticed. And so's Solar flute. =3 Hey, listen, please try to ignore what I said; I honestly don't know why I started drama queening. x.x" I guess I was moody that day (it was pretty rough).--Twilight Helryx 02:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Category
[edit]I realize I should have brought it here first, but I did create a category for WikiGryphon users. It is linked to the userbox, so those with it will be included. I kinda' jumped the gun with this without getting a consensus or anything (as there hasn't been much activity here, but I've seen users with the box), so if there is anybody against this, please tell me and I'll get it deleted.
My main intent with this was to start the creation of categories for all of the WikiFauna types, as this seems to be a fairly good way of uniting different types of users. I could not find a talk page about WikiFauna in general, so I went ahead and started, possibly prematurely. If anybody disagrees with me (that categories should be started for users identifying themselves as WikiFauna), tell me. EWikistTalk 16:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Humorous
[edit]Despite the ubiquitous notices found on many WP project pages, I do not find such pages humorous in any way. Is there a way that I can initiate a poll to reach community consensus? TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 20:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- It's not humorous as in ha-ha funny, it's humorous as in it's not meant to be taken seriously. — Jean Calleo (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)