Jump to content

William Blake (economist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

William Blake (31 January 1774 – 1852) was an English classical economist who contributed to the early theory of purchasing power parity.[1]

Life

[edit]

He was born in London on 31 January 1774, the son of William and Alicia Blake. He was educated at Charterhouse School, and entered Trinity College, Cambridge in 1789. He graduated B.A. in 1793 as 7th wrangler, became a Fellow of the college in 1795, and graduated M.A. in 1796.[2] Giving up his fellowship in 1797, he entered Lincoln's Inn, and was called to the bar in 1799.[3] Blake was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1807.[4] He served as President of the Geological Society of London in 1815–6, which he had joined in 1812.[5][6] He became a member of the Royal Geographical Society in 1830.[7] He also belonged to the Political Economy Club, from 1831, and the King of Clubs dining club of Whigs.[8][9][10]

St John's Lodge, original architectural drawing by Robert Adam; the actual design was somewhat modified.

Blake leased St John's Lodge in Welwyn, Hertfordshire, with a park of 130 acres, from 1819. He purchased the property in 1824, changing the name to Danesbury.[11][12] He was High Sheriff of Hertfordshire in 1836.[13] As a result of the Slave Compensation Act 1837, Blake was given £34,301 in compensation from the British government as the trustee of the estate of John Robley, his brother-in-law; Robley's estate included slaves in Tobago and Saint Kitts.[14]

Views

[edit]

Blake was initially known as a bullionist, one of the monetary writers of the early 19th century.[15] He published Observations on the Principles Which Regulate the Course of Exchange, and on the Present Depreciated Slate of the Currency (1810).[16] For half a century it was considered a leading authority on exchange rates.[17] It made heavy reference to the writing of John Wheatley.[18] Fossati has argued that the debates on money and bank credit for British parliamentary reports of 1804 and 1810 clarified the theory, at the hands of Wheatley and others, including in particular Blake and John Leslie Foster (with Walter Boyd, Lord King, and Henry Thornton).[19] Joseph Lowe, who wrote many reviews of the pamphlet literature of the bullion debate, approved of Blake's content but complained he was verbose.[20]

Blake's 1823 pamphlet on government expenditure, Observations on the Effects Produced by Government Expenditure during the Restriction of Cash Payments, caused a stir, however. It was a pioneer work of its period, and has been considered to have anticipated the transfer theory of Frank William Taussig.[10][21] David Ricardo wrote a reply, and Blake a rejoinder.[22] Ricardo wrote notes on Blake that remained unpublished until 1951. Matters of definition still plagued discussion: Ricardo's idea of depreciation clouded, in Blake's view, the issues.[23] In common with many contemporaries, Blake used balance of trade inconsistently or unclearly as a term.[24]

Mark Blaug's view was that Blake had shown up "blind spots" in Ricardo's theory.[25] Ricardo wrote to his correspondent Hutches Trower that John Ramsay McCulloch hadn't managed to talk Blake out of his "newly published opinions";[26] in fact, as he told McCulloch, Ricardo had seen the paper before publication, and concluded that Blake agreed more with him than he was aware of.[27] John Stuart Mill in reviewing the work denied the ability of governments to stimulate economic activity.[28] Mill defended Say's law, while Blake was more in sympathy with the views of Robert Malthus on the economic depression of the early 1820s (though he added a disclaimer on not arguing in terms of public policy).[29][30] Mill in defending Ricardo interpreted the orthodox doctrine on the export of gold in a way that conceded its part in bilateral trade.[31] He in fact used some of Blake's ideas in his later work Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy (1844), without attribution.[32]

McCulloch later reprinted Blake's 1810 pamphlet, praising it in his introduction of 1857.[33]

Family

[edit]

Blake married Mary Nash 25 July 1797 (bringing an end to his fellowship) and the estates of John Darker were settled on the couple.[11] The death in 1822 of Edward Loveden Loveden of Buscot Park, who had married Mary's sister Anne, brought them an inheritance.[34] They had three sons and five daughters. The sons were:

The daughters were:

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Bunting, Frederick H. (1939). "The Purchasing Power Parity Theory Reexamined". Southern Economic Journal. 5 (3): 282–301. doi:10.2307/3693890. JSTOR 3693890.
  2. ^ "Blake, William (BLK788W)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge.
  3. ^ Legacies of British Slave-ownership, William Blake 1774 – 1852.
  4. ^ Royal Society Fellow details Blake; William (c 1774 – 1852).
  5. ^ www.geolsoc.org.uk/, Past Presidents.
  6. ^ Ricardo, David. The works of David Ricardo. Open Library.
  7. ^ Clements Robert Markham, The Fifty Years' Work of the Royal Geographical Society (1881), p. 26;archive.org.
  8. ^ Shannon C. Stimson (3 August 2009). After Adam Smith: A Century of Transformation in Politics and Political Economy. Princeton University Press. p. 183. ISBN 978-0-691-15234-9. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  9. ^ Political Economy Club of London (1860). Names of Members, 1821–1860, Rules of the Club and List of Questions Discussed ... Political Economy Club. p. 12. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  10. ^ a b Mason, Will E. (1956). "The Stereotypes of Classical Transfer Theory". Journal of Political Economy. 64 (6): 492–506. doi:10.1086/257862. JSTOR 1826107. S2CID 155085233.
  11. ^ a b c d The National Archives, Estate and family papers of the Blake family of Danesbury, Welwyn, 1776–1924.
  12. ^ Hugh C. Prince (2008). Parks in Hertfordshire Since 1500. University of Hertfordshire Press. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-9542189-9-7. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  13. ^ Bulletins of State Intelligence. 1836. p. 48. Retrieved 15 May 2013.
  14. ^ "William Blake". University College London. Retrieved on 20 March 2019.
  15. ^ Denis Patrick O'Brien (2004). The classical economists revisited. Princeton University Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-691-11939-7. Retrieved 15 May 2013.
  16. ^ Robert Watt (1824). Bibliotheca Britannica, or a general index to British and foreign literature. Constable. p. 120. Retrieved 15 May 2013.
  17. ^ William Warren Bartley; Stephen Kresge (1991). The trend of economic thinking: essays on Political Economistis and Economic History. Routledge. pp. 205–6. ISBN 978-0-415-03515-6. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  18. ^ Fetter, Frank Whitson (June 1942). "The Life and Writings of John Wheatley". Journal of Political Economy. 50 (3): 357–376. doi:10.1086/255877. JSTOR 1829331. S2CID 153901855.
  19. ^ Guillebaud, C. W. (December 1950). "Review of Ricerche sui Contributi Inglesi alla Teoría Della Moneta". The Economic Journal. 60 (240): 805–806. doi:10.2307/2226727. JSTOR 2226727.
  20. ^ Alexander Dick (12 April 2013). Romanticism and the Gold Standard: Money, Literature, and Economic Debate in Britain 1790–1830. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 32–3. ISBN 978-1-137-29293-3. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  21. ^ Corry, B. A. (1958). "The Theory of the Economic Effects of Government Expenditure in English Classical Political Economy". Economica. 25 (97): 34–48. doi:10.2307/2550692. JSTOR 2550692.
  22. ^ Stigler, George J. (September 1953). "Sraffa's Ricardo". The American Economic Review. 43 (4): 586–599. JSTOR 1812400.
  23. ^ Sayers, R. S. (February 1953). "Ricardo's Views on Monetary Questions". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 67 (1): 30–49. doi:10.2307/1884147. JSTOR 1884147.
  24. ^ Fetter, Frank Whitson (August 1935). "The Term "Favorable Balance of Trade"". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 49 (4): 621–645. doi:10.2307/1885402. JSTOR 1885402.
  25. ^ Timothy S. Davis (2 May 2005). Ricardo's Macroeconomics: Money, Trade Cycles, and Growth. Cambridge University Press. pp. 175–. ISBN 978-0-521-84474-1. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  26. ^ Letters of David Ricardo to Hutches Trower and Others, 1811–1823 (1899), pp. 205–6; archive.org.
  27. ^ Ricardo, David (1895). "Letters of David Ricardo to John Ramsay McCulloch". Publications of the American Economic Association. 10 (5/6): 1–182. JSTOR 2485869.
  28. ^ Fetter, Frank W. (1962). "Economic Articles in the Westminster Review and Their Authors, 1824-51". Journal of Political Economy. 70 (6): 570–596. doi:10.1086/258717. JSTOR 1828780. S2CID 154477157.
  29. ^ Donald Winch (26 January 1996). Riches and Poverty: An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750–1834. Cambridge University Press. p. 365. ISBN 978-0-521-55920-1. Retrieved 15 May 2013.
  30. ^ Progress and Profits in British Economic Thought, 1650–1850. CUP Archive. 1950. p. 175. GGKEY:4F2QWQK4DDW. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  31. ^ Mason, Will E. (February 1957). "Ricardo's Transfer-Mechanism Theory". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 71 (1): 107–115. doi:10.2307/1882298. hdl:10.2307/1882298. JSTOR 1882298.
  32. ^ Thomas Sowell (1994). Classical Economics Reconsidered. Princeton University Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-691-00358-0. Retrieved 15 May 2013.
  33. ^ John Ramsay McCulloch (1857). A Select Collection of Scarce and Valuable Tracts and Other Publications, on Paper Currency and Banking: From the Originals of Hume, Wallace, Thornton, Ricardo, Blake, Huskisson, and Others ; with a Preface, Notes, and Index. Lord Overstone. pp. 17–. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  34. ^ historyofparliamentonline.org, Loveden, Edward Loveden (?1751–1822), of Buscot Park, Berks.
  35. ^ Livre du Recteur de l'Académie de Genève : 1559–1878 (le). Librairie Droz. 1959. p. 207. ISBN 978-2-600-03193-6. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
  36. ^ "welwyn.org.uk, List of burials in Welwyn churchyard, memorials within the church and names found only on the 1906 record of memorials. Surnames starting A-C". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 16 May 2013.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Blake_(economist)&oldid=1258018273"