Jump to content

Talk:Cradle of Liberty Council

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qunho (talk | contribs) at 12:05, 27 September 2006 ([[Treasure Island (Scout reservation)|Treasure Island (Scout reservation) merge]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconScouting B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconCradle of Liberty Council is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPhiladelphia B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPennsylvania B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Camp articles, and why they should stay separate

Merge tags

I have added merge tags to the two council camp articles, as per the Rules and Standards of the Scouting WikiProject. -- CampMinsi 06:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was asked for an independent opinion on these articles. I am not a scout, and have only lived in PA for a few years, but in reading through these articles, I would endorse the comments to keep them independent and not merge them. They are OK as stand alone articles, and for a reader who is not familiar with these organizations, the separate articles are fine. Scott Mingus 01:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • agree to Resica merge-as per the standard which was set and agreed upon early in 2006. The only reasonable exceptions to established policy would be if a camp had a significance beyond the local region-i.e. a camp where a National or World Jamboree was held, or a longstanding national program available to the bulk of Scouts was created there, or similarly significant outside of its vicinity. So the first Scout camp on Mars, or the camp where President Schwarzenegger reaches peace between North and South Koreas, would be good candidates for stand alone articles. Chris 17:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disagree I disagree with the policy (as Chris knows.
  1. I think that the article is substantial enough to stand on its own.
  2. This article was also featured on Did you know.
  3. As a member of WikiProject Pennsylvania and WikiProject Philadelphia I think these articles should all remain separate. --evrik 00:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Finally, the Cradle of Liberty Council article would be cluttered by this merger. --evrik 00:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The policy exists (as you acknowledge above), and has for over half a year. That you disagree does not give you the right to revert merges. I have established policy behind me on this, and the Scouting project facilitator has acknowledged that camps are sub-council entities and so fall under the policy. Chris 00:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Way more than three people voted for it back in February. You win some, you lose some. Chris 01:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This is a cross-project discussion. Recall, WP:CCC. This violates that, which says consensus can change. It formerly was called No Binding Decisions. If two WikiProjects have dissenting conventions, perhaps it should come up for some kind of vote? Personally, I am opposed to merging these articles, as they both have substance to them. --myselfalso 01:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merger as per myselfalso above. Squamate 02:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policies on content acceptability

Template:Veri policy

Please help bring this article into compliance. ClairSamoht - Help make Wikipedia the most authoritative source of information in the world 08:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • Yes, someone can. This article doesn't meet Wikipedia standards for acceptable content.
    • For instance, the first paragraph. The only citation is an article that says the city of Philadelphia is evicting the scouts because they won't stop discriminating. Nothing there to say that the council was formed in 1996, nothing there to say that CLC was formed by merging the Philadelphia and Valley Forge Councils, nothing to say that it's the largest council in Pennsylvania, and third-largest in the BSA.
    • The next three sections, consisting of history, scout camps, and order of the arrow, have no cites whatsoever to back up what is being said.
    • WIKIPEDIA IS NOT GEOCITIES. You can't just write whatever you please; if it hasn't been published by another reliable source, it has no place in Wikipedia.
    • This article needs to be trustworthy. It needs to obey Wikipedia policies. ClairSamoht - Help make Wikipedia the most authoritative source of information in the world 18:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wow, are you this always this polite? Anyway, at least we now know what you were speaking about ... --evrik 18:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]