User talk:Iijjccoo

Welcome!

Hello, Iijjccoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DS 16:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Termunterzijlkerk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Termunterzijlkerk.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for adding th figure of William on the William of Orange article. However, tThe same remark as above goes for your recent image willem1.jpg. If you made the picture yourself (which I guess you did), no problem you are the copyright owner, just state you made it and release it's use to wikipedia by picking a relevant copyright license. If you do not the image will be removed very quickly because Wiki is very careful with copyright violation. Thanks and keep up the good work Arnoutf 18:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I made both Images my self with my digital camara. What do I have to do to let them stay in Wikipedia? Iijjccoo 20:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Lloyd333.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lloyd333.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Spruitjes333.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Spruitjes333.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —An gr 13:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Eelkens

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Jacob Eelkens, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NEMO.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NEMO.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ilse @ 11:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NetherlandsAmericanCemetery2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:NetherlandsAmericanCemetery2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 14:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vraag

Ik ben Tim Traas, ik heb je foto gezien van het Catshuis. En ik zou hem graag willen gebruiken voor mijn roman in eigen-beheer uitgave "Gevangenge van Perfectie. In de Nederlandse wiki kan je wat vinden over mijn eerste roman onder de titel "De bachmayer coup". Ik wil u natuurlijk naamsvermelding er voor geven. u kunt mij bereiken op msn007tt@zeelandnet.nl —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.176.213.15 (talk) 10:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gogh126.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gogh126.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cat333.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cat333.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Allardmuseum2.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Ardennes333.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Blokzijl.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:39, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Blauwbrug333.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Bridgegroningen.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Bikeinindia.JPG

You uploaded or restored , File:Bikeinindia.JPG, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hoogholtje bridge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoogholtje bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoogholtje bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 01:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]