User talk:Netpilots

Deletion discussion about Mall of Switzerland

Hello, Netpilots,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mall of Switzerland should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mall of Switzerland .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 12:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GoslingsGingerBeerCan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GoslingsGingerBeerCan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sabine Dahinden moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sabine Dahinden, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sabine Dahinden is important and relevant in Switzerland. The aticle deserves an english version. Since I created the article, many authors edited the page. --Netpilots (talk) 12:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabine Dahinden (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sabine Dahinden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sabine Dahinden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 20:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Netpilots! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 20:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert BLP

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:55, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabine Dahinden (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Etothepi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sabine Dahinden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sabine Dahinden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

•≈20+π^{(talk to me!)} 18:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Etothepi:, Sabine Dahinden is a holder of the Prix Walo. Therefore she is reliable for an article in Wikipedia. Users of the english Wikipedia might not know what Prix Walo is. I have to give up. --Netpilots (talk) 01:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Netpilots She may well be notable, but the sources you have do not help establish that. •≈20+π^{(talk to me!)} 01:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

etothepi Sources and references can only be the Prix Walo page and some info at Swiss TV. --Netpilots (talk) 01:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sabine Dahinden concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sabine Dahinden, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sabine Dahinden

Hello, Netpilots. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sabine Dahinden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear UnitedStatesian, I would love to have the Article Sabine Dahinden in the english Wikipedia. In the german Wikipedia, Sabine is well known. She won prizes and she is a TV Speaker. In the english Wikipedia, Sabine is not relevant. It's hopeless I have no idea how to bring Sabine Dahinden to Wikipedia. I have to give up. Greettings from Switzerland--Netpilots (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]